"Any destruction of evidence of election fraud precludes certification of the election results, as the required checks become impossible. So if the fraudulent results cannot simply be reversed, there are grounds for redoing the entire election."
https://twitter.com/RealChrisLangan/status/1340108106982813696
Dude seems to be based. Yet it is just common fricken sense.
The fact that everyone isn't just opening up their doors wide to let as many eyes as possible look at this to prove beyond any Shadow of a doubt that trump legitimately lost this election is 100% proof to me that they cheated.
Seriously, it's a win/win for them to do it, so there must be a good reason.
What better way to prove themselves right and that Trump is an idiot (their opinion not mine), then to make it seem like he's a bumbling loony who can't cope with the fact that he lost?
The fact that they aren't taking advantage of that opportunity and instead hiding everything says it all.
But they are doing "Muh recounts" of fraudulent ballots so the media optics make it look like they are investigating and evil Trump has no grounds to complain
Not necessarily, it's just that when it comes to certain matters the burden of proof is inverted.
As in, irregular chain of custody does not prove culpability, and on a regular criminal case it wouldn't be enough to do anything, it's just a pointer that'll help you know what to put your efforts into. On a criminal case the defendant is innocent until proven guilty, hence why many kinds of evidence are not gonna put you in jail, they may indicate that you could be guilty but they don't prove it.
When it comes to an election it's common sense that it's the opposite, the burden of proof is inverted. The election is fraudulent unless proven otherwise, this applies to every election and this is why all of the process is so carefully dictated, organized and protocolized, you basically do everything by the book in order for you to be able to defend your process, because you're considered guilty from the start. Some people may believe this argument is insane, but ask yourself how the IRS works... you gotta pay your taxes and if you lost a receipt then that's too bad, as long as the IRS knows that receipt doesn't exist and it's on you to prove it's existence, you're guilty until proven otherwise.
This is why I fail to understand anyone not seeing what's happening in this election, normally I'd say it's all a conspiracy and whatnot, but the MSM have convinced me there was more fraud than we even think there was (rationally speaking, I don't buy the "Trump won in all counties" argument, sorry) since they refuse to even acknowledge any of it.
In other words: An irregular chain of custody = illegitimate result.
"Any destruction of evidence of election fraud precludes certification of the election results, as the required checks become impossible. So if the fraudulent results cannot simply be reversed, there are grounds for redoing the entire election." https://twitter.com/RealChrisLangan/status/1340108106982813696
Dude seems to be based. Yet it is just common fricken sense.
Sounds pretty racist to me
"We cheat in areas with lots of black, so if you stop our cheating, you're racist"
I am racist. I hate any democrat of all colors. Red green pink. Dont give a fuck i hate you and FUCK YOU IN THE FACE
I believe the election of 1876 was settled that fraud vitiates everything. The Democrats have no legal standing.
Langan is very, very based.
I've said this before but I'll say it again.
The fact that everyone isn't just opening up their doors wide to let as many eyes as possible look at this to prove beyond any Shadow of a doubt that trump legitimately lost this election is 100% proof to me that they cheated.
Seriously, it's a win/win for them to do it, so there must be a good reason.
What better way to prove themselves right and that Trump is an idiot (their opinion not mine), then to make it seem like he's a bumbling loony who can't cope with the fact that he lost?
The fact that they aren't taking advantage of that opportunity and instead hiding everything says it all.
You would think if he lost they would be dying to show the world bidens landslide and rub it In his face.
tdlr... what do they have to lose if they didn't cheat...
So many people scared. It's all about legit survival and this is dangerous times.
But they are doing "Muh recounts" of fraudulent ballots so the media optics make it look like they are investigating and evil Trump has no grounds to complain
Not necessarily, it's just that when it comes to certain matters the burden of proof is inverted.
As in, irregular chain of custody does not prove culpability, and on a regular criminal case it wouldn't be enough to do anything, it's just a pointer that'll help you know what to put your efforts into. On a criminal case the defendant is innocent until proven guilty, hence why many kinds of evidence are not gonna put you in jail, they may indicate that you could be guilty but they don't prove it.
When it comes to an election it's common sense that it's the opposite, the burden of proof is inverted. The election is fraudulent unless proven otherwise, this applies to every election and this is why all of the process is so carefully dictated, organized and protocolized, you basically do everything by the book in order for you to be able to defend your process, because you're considered guilty from the start. Some people may believe this argument is insane, but ask yourself how the IRS works... you gotta pay your taxes and if you lost a receipt then that's too bad, as long as the IRS knows that receipt doesn't exist and it's on you to prove it's existence, you're guilty until proven otherwise.
This is why I fail to understand anyone not seeing what's happening in this election, normally I'd say it's all a conspiracy and whatnot, but the MSM have convinced me there was more fraud than we even think there was (rationally speaking, I don't buy the "Trump won in all counties" argument, sorry) since they refuse to even acknowledge any of it.
metoo
metoo?
gtfo with that feminist garbage!
In other words. THEY have to prove it's fair. We don't have to prove it was stolen.
Election jurisprudence trumps "common sense", and it does not support an "inverted burden of proof".