4791 The Smartest Man in the world Chris Langan gets it! "It is not necessary to "prove election fraud". It is only necessary to observe that after the culprits have covered their tracks by destroying evidence, there are no grounds for certification." (twitter.com) posted 112 days ago by MakeFreedomRing 112 days ago by MakeFreedomRing +4791 / -0 92 comments share 92 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (92) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 76 ▼ – PlateOwner 76 points 112 days ago +76 / -0 Nobody in the media ever discussed the onus. Is it on Trump to prove there was fraud or the election companies to prove the chain of custody wasn't broken? Never comes up. Show me one conservative news article on this. permalink save report block reply ▲ 26 ▼ – Jestre 26 points 112 days ago +26 / -0 People in the media these days generally get there because their looks or who's dick they sucked (if on tv) or are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their job in a contracting industry (newspapers). Don't expect much from them permalink parent save report block reply
Nobody in the media ever discussed the onus.
Is it on Trump to prove there was fraud or the election companies to prove the chain of custody wasn't broken?
Never comes up. Show me one conservative news article on this.
People in the media these days generally get there because their looks or who's dick they sucked (if on tv) or are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their job in a contracting industry (newspapers). Don't expect much from them