4791 The Smartest Man in the world Chris Langan gets it! "It is not necessary to "prove election fraud". It is only necessary to observe that after the culprits have covered their tracks by destroying evidence, there are no grounds for certification." (twitter.com) posted 112 days ago by MakeFreedomRing 112 days ago by MakeFreedomRing +4791 / -0 92 comments share 92 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (92) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 5 ▼ – Kekbewithus 5 points 112 days ago +6 / -1 This is pretty obvious. Legally speaking, deleting evidence or obstructing an investigation is an immediate guilty plea to whatever the charge is. Example: refusing a breathalyzer is an automatic DUI, not filing your taxes is automatic tax crime, etc etc. permalink save report block reply
This is pretty obvious. Legally speaking, deleting evidence or obstructing an investigation is an immediate guilty plea to whatever the charge is.
Example: refusing a breathalyzer is an automatic DUI, not filing your taxes is automatic tax crime, etc etc.