4791 The Smartest Man in the world Chris Langan gets it! "It is not necessary to "prove election fraud". It is only necessary to observe that after the culprits have covered their tracks by destroying evidence, there are no grounds for certification." (twitter.com) posted 112 days ago by MakeFreedomRing 112 days ago by MakeFreedomRing +4791 / -0 92 comments share 92 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (92) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – bingobangobongo69 1 point 111 days ago +1 / -0 Election jurisprudence trumps "common sense", and it does not support an "inverted burden of proof". permalink save report block reply
Election jurisprudence trumps "common sense", and it does not support an "inverted burden of proof".