1675
Comments (195)
sorted by:
212
LiskaEman 212 points ago +212 / -0

And she's staying in Trump Tower . Something about these stories really doesn't sit right with me - If Trump wants to see someone he'll see someone; that includes Sidney.

159
Donnybiceps 159 points ago +159 / -0

Like I've said before, there is so much disinformation out there i don't even know what to make of it at this point. This disinformation campaign is top notch cause this is the first time I can't keep track what is real or not. The disinformation put out on our side is done on purpose but whats the point of it all?

93
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 93 points ago +96 / -3

no matter what anyone says it is a potential sign of a military operation incoming as they are going out of their way to look confused and defeated. Why make these inner workings public unless they want to look weak.

59
deleted 59 points ago +72 / -13
51
evil-doer 51 points ago +61 / -10

No kidding. Every single failure has an army of people saying "its a part of the plan!" ... uh, well this is a really fucking stupid plan.. Maybe shit is just completely fucked.

41
NinjaPede 41 points ago +42 / -1

Mostly because it just doesn’t quite make sense. How the hell could anyone not allow president trump to see someone?

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
1
HAKUJIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they’re being payed to. How this is not obvious is beyond me.

1
NinjaPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I understand that people would try to obstruct him, but Trump not having the power to say fuck off? That doesn’t make sense.

21
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 21 points ago +21 / -0

maybe but i just find it hard to believe his advisors are over on him. Also the mood and posts he has displayed since then seem to be very much engaged still in the fight.

13
Destineed369 13 points ago +13 / -0

If he’s in the fight we’re in the fight 👍👍👍

-13
deleted -13 points ago +4 / -17
15
evil-doer 15 points ago +16 / -1

Do you believe SCOTUS stabbing him in the back was part of a plan?

4
DarkestMatt 4 points ago +5 / -1

I believe relying on SCOTUS was never part of any plan.

3
TruthWillOut 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did the Texas suit expose that the "leader" of SCOTUS is compromised?

3
joker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you lay it out here for a simple mind to understand? Because as the saying goes, if you can't explain it simple, you might be not intelligent enough.

41
bighomiebeenchillin 41 points ago +52 / -11

simple minded nigga this man donald straight wrote da art of war version 2 decades ago. this nigga straight said its da 🔑 to look weak when ur strong so da enemy thinks he cool before u run up on that nigga from behind and start poking.

trump n his niggas got every reason to look weak in public and zero reason to look strong like they bout to go get these niggas. use ur fucking head u dumb ho if they were really strugglin behind da scenes theyd be sayin they got a foolproof case not admitting that they weak this is physics 101

23
KingOfKekistan 23 points ago +24 / -1

bro you every see the movie Airplane?

you speak jive?

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
4
ConfiscateTheCoats 4 points ago +4 / -0

based

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-15
deleted -15 points ago +5 / -20
23
bighomiebeenchillin 23 points ago +24 / -1

it wont work with u cause ur a bitch made nigga with no leverage

8
inspir3dgenius 8 points ago +9 / -1

You have my vote for 2024

1
PocketPosse 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sorry about your downvotes. Its a good comment. Its hard to watch everyone rationalize every setback as a new path to victory. Trump might* be playing possum, but how dead does it need to smell before it starts working?

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
21
p8riot 21 points ago +21 / -0

Trump has a phone right? This is theater.

15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
8
paganbutterchurner 8 points ago +10 / -2

Absolutely, simple explain actions. Look at Barr , how many retards excusing his non-action . If we acted on it sooner he would have been out sooner. We need to act on this now, tell meadows he better not fucking slow down trump and conceding is not an option

4
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Possibly but i don't think so. Its very speculative what's going on. I just don't think this jives with the presidents mood and posts he has displayed since then.

7
RahkeemTheMachine 7 points ago +7 / -0

Or it’s December 24th and they’re just running out the clock

3
Highball 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree that this is the slight of hand, hand. What thee other hand is doing, military or other, I definitely want to know.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
LiskaEman 13 points ago +13 / -0

Theres gotta be something going on, but god knows what any of it is lol. Most of the likely successful efforts are off the radar right now, and mostly focused on getting the evidence out to the masses.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
speelurker 6 points ago +6 / -0

To sow indecision in the enemy.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
34
JonathanE 34 points ago +37 / -3

The Art of War. Appear disorganised and strike your opponent by surprise when they least expect it.

18
Paul-Revere 18 points ago +19 / -1

Yup. Why would they broadcast any part of their true plan! These are the final days before some of the biggest moves we’ve ever seen. At least that’s my hope and prayer.

12
iPissExcellence 12 points ago +12 / -0

It has to be. Not only because it's GEOTUS and he's a pimp, but they'd destroy him and his family the minute he leaves office. And then us.

13
paganbutterchurner 13 points ago +15 / -2

I’m done with this appear weak when you are strong bullshit. Meadows is part of an internal team that is making Trump go light on the left or even concede. That’s confirmed by Bryce and Powell tweet that people here said was fake news until trump tweet confirmed it.

If we stopped quoting arty of war maybe Barr would have been fired much earlier. Instead people talk about some grand homosexual plan that gave Barr and excuse

4
NerBolanski 4 points ago +7 / -3

“Trust the plan” retards are a bit annoying.I want us to put Trump under pressure.i think he has bad and weak advisors and he is pissed at them but he doesn’t get pushback from his base. Lots of people here don’t like platinum plan or criminal justice reform but there was never any strong pushback by the base.the more pressure we put on Trump, the better Trump becomes.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
7
QuakerTheOat 7 points ago +8 / -1

you need to head straight over to 4chan /pol and get a big, fat red pill on that one.

18
bootsy_two_scoops 18 points ago +18 / -0

This aligns with Patrick Byrne's story. According to him, WH staffers have been blocking her calls.

2
Umm_genericusername 2 points ago +3 / -1

No BS, I think Trump knew Byrnes would speak on things and allowed him to see a false picture so he would spill 'weakness'. No way Trump planned for 2 years just to have weak ass Meadows and some cock mongrel nobody attorney block him.

13
stoic_troll 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's the Trump Hotel in DC, which is only a couple blocks from the White House.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
101
neverflinch 101 points ago +101 / -0

I don't get this. Why some people here hate her so much?

If it wasn't for her, how many of us will know the Antrim County report?

If she is lying, why the people in Maricopa county are refusing the subpoena?

101
Varx 101 points ago +103 / -2

The ones who are unfairly hated the most are usually the good ones.

Example being trump.

40
stoic_troll 40 points ago +40 / -0

💯

73
Sixty2ndAssassin 73 points ago +74 / -1

Anyone who hates her up in here is 99.99% a shill.

24
paganbutterchurner 24 points ago +24 / -0

That’s right. I’ll take her side over meadows anyway

3
Sphinx3peat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Meadows is a swamp cunt trying to get Trump to concede.

Sidney is fighting the rampant fraud to prove Trump won in a landslide.

I know whose side I’ll take in that equation.

3
DonttrustChina 3 points ago +3 / -0

This community has a tendency to run out of patience with people who make huge claims and fail to deliver on them. Sometimes too fast, considering what we're up against.

3
Dereliction 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be fair, we are operating on a short timeline.

-33
deleted -33 points ago +4 / -37
45
Gesirisi 45 points ago +46 / -1

Low IQ post. Firstly she has backed up nearly all of her claims, did you take the time to read the lawsuits she filed? Did you take the time to listen to her in court? Secondly, Sidney herself has personally spoken to the fact that we are in information war with the enemy. If she says things that don't pan out, it doesn't mean she lied. It means some of the things she says were meant to purposely throw off the enemy. Your comment shows that in chess you'd be checkmated before you even got yourself castled. Can't think two moves ahead.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +3 / -13
18
Susurro 18 points ago +18 / -0

I think the reality is that this fraud is so complex, even the people investigating it don't know all the aspects of it. Sidney has gone down the 'rabbit hole' into the real deep state psy-op aspect. Rudy is an old school criminal lawyer. He understands witnesses giving testimonies. Others like Bobby Piton and Dr. Shiva are cracking the numbers. I wouldn't be surprised if Rudy just doesn't know what to think of the rest. They are all correct in their own avenues of attack and it's important that all avenues BE attacked.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
Gesirisi 5 points ago +6 / -1

Low paid shill

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
12
MrCornPop 12 points ago +12 / -0

🤡

2
The_banned 2 points ago +4 / -2

Spotted the commie.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
The_banned 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ok, useful idiot then. There are only 2 kinds of people who come on here spouting fake news talking points.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
The_banned 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sydney put together appropriate lawsuits that would have demolished these states in a functional justice system. I hope you haven't been demoralized either. And trust me, we didn't need her to say anything for people on the outside to claim we were conspiricy theorists, that's the ongoing narrative they are pushing to hurt people like you.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
iPissExcellence 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're disinformation, faggot.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
iPissExcellence 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully a lesson not to speak of things you know nothing about.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-73
Smubbs -73 points ago +10 / -83

Because she’s all talk. BIbLicAl KrAcKeN... nothing has happened. She’s a larp along with Lin wood

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
24
neverflinch 24 points ago +24 / -0

But that's not true.

18
ImGlootchingg 18 points ago +19 / -1

Tell that to Enron.

15
Gesirisi 15 points ago +15 / -0

This type of shilling goes to show that the enemy wants us to be of low spirit and distrustful of Trump and his team. Interesting!

11
The_banned 11 points ago +11 / -0

Spotted the commie

66
Drgreygoose02 66 points ago +66 / -0

Sure, Newsweek as credible as the Enquirer

28
ProdigalPlaneswalker 28 points ago +28 / -0

That's an insult to The Enquirer

15
JohnSpartanSAPD 15 points ago +15 / -0

Newsweek went out of business years ago. They kept it alive as the weekly print edition of Vox articles.

5
CahalTheMad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Vox is less credible than Weekly World News.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Destineed369 3 points ago +3 / -0

That just ended up being a child bat. Fuck.

44
deleted 44 points ago +45 / -1
32
TinFoil 32 points ago +32 / -0

They are trying to make her look bad.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
30
deleted 30 points ago +31 / -1
5
PedeNo1 5 points ago +6 / -1

He is a master of distraction. I want to believe.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
7
TeslaTimeMachine 7 points ago +9 / -2

You should be asking whether Trump does.

All his devices are likely hardened and carefully managed by a team of "professionals". He likely only sees what they show him.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
6
TeslaTimeMachine 6 points ago +6 / -0

If he does, those accounts are likely state secrets, not public record.

Just saying. Trump can't fix what Trump doesn't know.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

These isolated and alone stories mirror the picture the MSM has been painting all along about DJT. Sounds like the administration is telling them what they want to hear.

I would bet money they did a lot more strategizing than yelling in that friday night meeting and part of that was this cover story- we will see soon enough I think!

3
The_banned 3 points ago +3 / -0

False. Trump uses his personal cellphone, against the wishes of the corrupt intelligence agencies. They were throwing fits about this at the beginning when they thought people still cared what they said and thought they could make a big deal out of it.

14
AmyInCO 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is from Newsweek. Enough said.

1
w0lver1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not really enough said. Are they not reputable?

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
9
GreenBear 9 points ago +9 / -0

The focus is on Sidney not being able to meet Trump.

Sounds very wrong.

Flynn and her are working together, Flynn sounds like he has free access to DJT. He should have been able to relay a message some way. She could probably even relay a message through Rudy. What fool is going to deny a Rudy comms with Trump. Maybe relaying through Melania if desperate, that Sidney wanted to speak and they're not allowing her to meet him.

I'll lean to Sidney is already IN. Byrne tweeting Cippollone was fired was true and an unintentional leak(or moved to a limited role), and was asked to delete immediately to keep it on the downlow because time is short and any impeding by legislation filed by Democrats would ruin meeting the acceralated deadline.

The misinformation is planted to make Dems think that Sidney's team (w/ Byrne) aren't already linking and cross referencing all his intel to confidential documents to get these guys on a double whammy of criminal indictments and voter fraud.

Maybe that's true, or I'm just dreaming. Hopefully we will know soon enough....

2
bubbadubs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, hear me out, because I’m really trying to logically put the pieces together and figure out the truth, but nothing seems to make much sense in either direction.

I’m torn. This sounds both highly improbable and, at the same time, extremely likely lol.

I too, don’t understand the fact that Sidney hasn’t been able to get in touch with the President.

Surely, if we know about it, he knows about it. Especially if it’s true what Patrick Byrne said, and I believe him, that he verbally appointed her to Special Counsel and gave her a security clearance. I mean it’s not like Trump just forgot about it lol.

To believe that Patrick Byrne is lying would also imply that Michael Flynn, who has been working closely with Byrne and Sidney and staying at Trump hotel with each other, is allowing him to just go out there and lie about the President and what he said in that meeting, which is highly unlikely and we would have to believe that Flynn isn’t a good guy, which I don’t believe to be the case. Trump would’ve come out and said something addressing one of these matters.

But Byrne also has repeatedly said that all three of them had to use essentially “Jedi mind tricks”, or a little finesse, to get the meeting (which also was reportedly 4.5 hours long and implies it wasn’t just some random “out of the blue” meeting).

None of this makes sense. Either Flynn, Sidney and Byrne are outright lying and Trump is allowing it, which doesn’t seem right to me, or something bigger is going on... an idea which I have been increasingly skeptical of up until this point of writing this.

Nothing makes sense and I’m both worried but at the time half-convinced Trumps got something in the works with Sidney and he doesn’t want the press shitting on it as it’s going on.

BUT, at the same time, in recent interviews Byrne has been saying he has information for Trump he didn’t get to tell him and he only needs 5 minutes to explain, which would imply he or Flynn/Powell doesn’t have a direct line to Trump... could this be a “Jedi mind trick” on the public/media to make them think nothing is going on?

I get that this is edging on “Q-level” thinking, and I’m not a q guy, but nothing else really adds up.

And if you add on top of all this Trumps recent tweet about him disagreeing with anyone who says a special counsel isn’t necessary, the most logical reasoning would be that he actually did appoint Sidney and she’s working on a case as we speak.

1
GreenBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a meeting that Sidney and Byrne were not officially invited to.

At that meeting was only supposed to be Trump, Flynn, Meadows, 3 WH advisors.

I would bet money Flynn saw the run around the lawyers were giving Trump didn't match with his goals, so he maybe texted them to get there to assist him.

Yes I've watched two interviews and listened to a podcast of Byrne and his recount. Everything he says sounds truthful. If they were lying of the accounts, at worst Trump would have called them out on Twitter, and at best he could have contacted Flynn to tell Byrne to retract everything he has said. Yet Bryne has not recanted and recounts the same story. Trump could have ended all that either in public view or private view.

Which leads me to believe there's some other play going on that we're unaware, but we won't know until 1/6. Either there is something or there wasn't, no point guessing more than that.


Know that I didn't read this text myself until the day Byrne dropped his second interview. But I did follow Trump's history during his presidency and remember the resistance he dealt with. Putting those two things together things seem to make more sense. Which leads me to believe Byrne is sitting on some pretty heavy stuff that he's not leaked yet.

READ https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/10/finale-the-deep-states-hillary-clinton-bribery-blackmail-sting-the-maria-butina-rape-murder-gambit/

IF HE IS TRUTHFUL, which I believe he is, because if he wasn't he would be shutdown and slapped with all sorts of lawsuits. Government would also have locked him down long ago.

I think I know what it is Byrne wanted to tell Trump based off that literature written if I guess accordingly it would have been:

"Trump your 4 years have been difficult because you entered into an already ongoing attack on the US government by the Deep State that has been quietly executed behind the scenes starting long before your time in office. You were NEVER meant to win, Hillary was. I was involved in an attempted sting on Hillary to get blackmail on her for taking bribes. I played out that sting and found out that the commands came from the very top of the chain of command. The blackmail would have kept her in line and at the mercy of Comey, Brennan, and Obama(Those 3 are members of the Deep State, they aren't the DS) all she needed to do was behave and serve her time as a "puppet president" and get rich, and after her term Big Mike was supposed to succeed. You, Trump, against all odds somehow got in the way of the grand scheme, and now they need to ensure that no one like you can cuck them in the future".

(When the two former agents were fired by Trump during the Mueller probe(Russia Hoax), the Democrats and MSM blew up a storm that Trump was removing political opposition to impede the probe, to the degree that it made me laugh while at the same time finding it odd. A logical person would say, sure he can fire them it's fully within his power, because they are agents NOT the investigation, simply replace them and the investigation continues, they're just bodies to execute)

Why did Byrne play along with the Hillary bribe?

He says long before the bribery took place he was tasked by Senator Specter and others to investigate the corruption in the government. The Senators wrote him a "golden ticket" that would provide him "extraordinary latitude under the laws" so he could do anything short of murder during his investigation. That piece of text was then stored within a safe at the DOJ, and in addition to the paper document, if the currently living Senators and two journalist wish to come forward themselves they could affirm his story.

Now the question that sits with me is WHY did Obama/Comey reach out to Byrne to do the Hillary bribe. Sure he's rich, but so are others. My guess is they knew he had a little document sitting in the DOJ that would protect him without any need to expose themselves. Byrne could just say "I was investigating Hillary for corruption" and a look into the DOJ safe he'd be allowed to go on his way.

Well that's like a summary of an abstract of his story. It's much longer.

I do believe Byrne and his team are sitting on many MOABs in relation to the government, and he chose Sidney to give that info too.

It also goes in hand with how bold she suddenly became accusing politicians and government officials. Same with Lin Wood.

Now that I think about it, Lin Wood, a defamation lawyer has been excessively egging on politicians in his twitter call outs...

9
BostonVoter 9 points ago +9 / -0

I would only trust her twitter etc.

8
highenergywinning 8 points ago +8 / -0

Newss.week fake news

8
notatheory 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not clicking to this site! She was at the White House on Sunday Night, not Friday night. She would tell us herself if something was up. Consider this BS, until she says otherwise from one of her own accounts. She knows how to speak directly to the people. She wouldn't go through some commie out of date website.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
DannieArcher1310 7 points ago +7 / -0

We must crush the tyrants and elite. We are finished as free people if we fail to do it and NOW is our single best chance of success

7
Trump2024 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sidney Powell is a qualified military lawyer. Could there be some truth to her not being able to see Trump because she will be leading a military tribunal and it would be a conflict of interest?

5
PennsylPede1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

I keep seeing this mentioned, but I have yet to see any proof that she's a military lawyer. Is there a credible source for this?

3
Trump2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point. I thought I read it in an interview with her but have also read credible people mentioning it. My gut is telling me my memory is correct but I'd prefer rock solid confirmation. My memory has been misfiring a lot lately.

3
PennsylPede1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

I looked at her Wiki, and didn't see mention of it there....not that Wiki is a reliable source. That's as far as I've looked into it, so I really have no idea if it's true or not.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Trump2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Minus the first sentence I'll go along with this post.

6
HalfKing 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did Anaconda write this?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
The_banned 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nah, She is gonna be Kracken some skulls as a special counsel or whatever.

6
TehAgent 6 points ago +6 / -0

fake and gay

4
v8power 4 points ago +4 / -0

Weird. Byrne made the same exact comment.

What transpired since that meeting such that it would be illegal or otherwise be held against the President or the investigation if he spoke with them?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
NZbacon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Weaponised disinformation.

Appear weak when you are strong.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TXRanger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep Fighting Sidney, If I can help let me know.

1
GnosticAwakening 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah cuz she got a big ass mouth...

1
TheDoninator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry whaaaaaaat?

Can you not DM him on Twitter? Or Tweet "Hey Potus pick up your phone", or have someone else on the team tell him?

Are you seriously telling me you never got an alternative way to contact the man you're working for.

1
defiant_liberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thing about Powell, her claims sound so crazy it seems like she has gone off the rails, but then you look at the facts and nothing else makes sense. This election goes way beyond a few registered dead people and a few bad apple vote counters. We're talking millions of unexplained votes, and coordination on an industrial scale. Not even the democrats believe the official explanations.

1
TinFoil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this really Sindey Powell? I read it on several credible news cycles. They are screwing themselves.

1
usuck911 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Trump don't call Powell then it means snake Meadows lied to Trump that Powell don't want anything to do with Trump anymore.

Get the picture?

Block Sidney Powell from contacting Trump then tell Trump it is Sidney Powell who don't want to contact him.

1
The_banned 1 point ago +1 / -0

She could just tweet him or some shit, or can't she? I've never used twitterbook.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
IcyHue 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not a lawyer so just assuming. Powell is doing an actual criminal trial thing, so Trump (and with him his law team) might just have to distance himself from her because the sitting president can't be involved in such, the less so when it targets elected officials (right?)

1
DefenderDad 1 point ago +1 / -0

The rook is in place. Time for the queen to attack.

1
KingOfKekistan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who is blocker her? Trump or his aides or ...?

WTF is going on?

1
CovefeMonk 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s Newsweek

1
PatriotFromME 1 point ago +1 / -0

get down to florida!

1
WanderingStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why source any story or quote from Newsweak. It is disinfo.

1
stonepony 1 point ago +1 / -0

Possible head fake and trap being laid.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Diotima 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're reading to much into this. There could be a number of reasons she thinks they're ignoring her... humans tend to think the worst when reality is much different.

1
Get-schlonged 1 point ago +1 / -0

Archive link doomer

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Endprism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chief of staff mark meadows is part of the blockade.

-2
Aldoraine007 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Damn, Trump is out here ghosting these hos.

-21
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef -21 points ago +4 / -25

Well she’s running around making huge claims that have yet to materialize so...

7
errydaktal 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wrong

7
Varx 7 points ago +7 / -0

kind of hard to materialize your claims when no court will look at your case due to "standing" or "too late".

2
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn’t say it was her fault did i

1
Varx 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, if it makes you feel better.. I never downvoted ya.

2
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re fine, i’m just pissed off that we have to actually deal with cucked judges who dont give a shit about the constitution. I sometimes forget thats not sidneys fault

3
Drgreygoose02 3 points ago +3 / -0

Such as?

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 1 point ago +1 / -0

That has nothing to do with what i said

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but where have those led to?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound like a typical shill, fuck off.

Nothing has resulted from her lawsuits as of yet and those are the facts. There’s nothing to “research” faggot, she’s just been spinning her wheels the whole time.

Back to reddit with you

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-24
guitarmastershredder -24 points ago +5 / -29

She was acting like a fool..

7
errydaktal 7 points ago +8 / -1

Not really. She's right

-48
Balsha8chan -48 points ago +3 / -51

maybe cuz she sucks at her job

29
Drgreygoose02 29 points ago +30 / -1

She took down Enron, you moron.

18
TippyTop1987 18 points ago +18 / -0

Your shill account is easy to find. Tons of deleted comments and all bearing high negative karma.

4
The_banned 4 points ago +4 / -0

With 8chan in the name, we know what we got here lol.

10
Meme_war_ii_vet 10 points ago +10 / -0

Maybe cause she's a special counsel now?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0