Does that mean it didn't happen? Do you have any idea how many posts people miss here due to volume? Not to mention people STILL posting about the July amendment to this as recent as this morning.
As stated in one of my replies: People on this site are STILL posting about the NDAA amendment from July as though it is still a threat. I did this to help people who cannot navigate this site as easily as others and fall victim to misinformation. Not to mention important news being buried by low quality, non-thinking posts from small minded jerks who assume people's intentions, such as you.
Don't act like to have the higher ground here just because you know how to be caustic on the internet. Clearly you are too young to know how to treat humans properly. You have zero leverage in this conversation.
Hey go post about about Wikileaks releasing the DNC emails, or maybe Pizzagate. You know, all these breaking news stories.
You can post about the NDAA, sure, but you're one of the people labeling things "breaking" that happened in the past and have already been covered on here ad nauseum. You contributed nothing of value by labeling it breaking. It only serves to cause those who read your post title to think it's something they should read, despite it ACTUALLY breaking two days before your post. Why did you label it breaking?
This comment, "Another child angry because he cannot read.", still applies to your second comment.
Why? Because I have explained in great detail my motive and defended it thoroughly within the comments.
Clearly the 5 or 6 childish, arrogant, reactionary millennials such as you greatly bothered by this posts are the minority on this website. How do I know? --> " +328 / -0"
Does that mean it didn't happen? Do you have any idea how many posts people miss here due to volume? Not to mention people STILL posting about the July amendment to this as recent as this morning.
Sounds like you didn't think this through.
You're the one that labeled it breaking, lol
Bowen Xiao labeled it breaking. Did you even read it?
He labeled it breaking at 3:22 PM on the 23rd. You posted it about 9:20 AM on the 25th.
Clearly you cannot read either, or are unwilling to..
I'm not typing this again, so:
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNojKD3P/x/c/4DrvZMoBMll
As stated in one of my replies: People on this site are STILL posting about the NDAA amendment from July as though it is still a threat. I did this to help people who cannot navigate this site as easily as others and fall victim to misinformation. Not to mention important news being buried by low quality, non-thinking posts from small minded jerks who assume people's intentions, such as you.
It cuts right to the point and avoids B.S.
Don't act like to have the higher ground here just because you know how to be caustic on the internet. Clearly you are too young to know how to treat humans properly. You have zero leverage in this conversation.
Is that the guy that filled out the 'title' field of your post form? Show me on the form where he touched you
Almost your entire comment history is trolling in one form or another.
I wish I was a "reply guy" like you so I could stroke my own fragile ego.
https://thedonald.win/u/permissible_missile/
I have explained my motives clearly for posting this as I did.
Merry Christmas
And so the countdown begins. The reason that’s significant is because it included a clause that stripped his power to use the EO.
Breaking two days ago. What a dumb post.
Another child angry because he cannot read.
Hey go post about about Wikileaks releasing the DNC emails, or maybe Pizzagate. You know, all these breaking news stories.
You can post about the NDAA, sure, but you're one of the people labeling things "breaking" that happened in the past and have already been covered on here ad nauseum. You contributed nothing of value by labeling it breaking. It only serves to cause those who read your post title to think it's something they should read, despite it ACTUALLY breaking two days before your post. Why did you label it breaking?
This comment, "Another child angry because he cannot read.", still applies to your second comment.
Why? Because I have explained in great detail my motive and defended it thoroughly within the comments.
Clearly the 5 or 6 childish, arrogant, reactionary millennials such as you greatly bothered by this posts are the minority on this website. How do I know? --> " +328 / -0"
Lol I'm a millennial now? Get back to posting about yesterday's news.
Edit: Just because you explained your reasoning doesn't make you correct. You did post a 2 day old story and claimed it was breaking.
Oh my, you mean it would once again be illegal for the government to spy on U.S. citizens.
What a concept.
Of course we know the demons won't have any part of it. (Unless they replace it with something worse)