Hey go post about about Wikileaks releasing the DNC emails, or maybe Pizzagate. You know, all these breaking news stories.
You can post about the NDAA, sure, but you're one of the people labeling things "breaking" that happened in the past and have already been covered on here ad nauseum. You contributed nothing of value by labeling it breaking. It only serves to cause those who read your post title to think it's something they should read, despite it ACTUALLY breaking two days before your post. Why did you label it breaking?
This comment, "Another child angry because he cannot read.", still applies to your second comment.
Why? Because I have explained in great detail my motive and defended it thoroughly within the comments.
Clearly the 5 or 6 childish, arrogant, reactionary millennials such as you greatly bothered by this posts are the minority on this website. How do I know? --> " +328 / -0"
Hey go post about about Wikileaks releasing the DNC emails, or maybe Pizzagate. You know, all these breaking news stories.
You can post about the NDAA, sure, but you're one of the people labeling things "breaking" that happened in the past and have already been covered on here ad nauseum. You contributed nothing of value by labeling it breaking. It only serves to cause those who read your post title to think it's something they should read, despite it ACTUALLY breaking two days before your post. Why did you label it breaking?
This comment, "Another child angry because he cannot read.", still applies to your second comment.
Why? Because I have explained in great detail my motive and defended it thoroughly within the comments.
Clearly the 5 or 6 childish, arrogant, reactionary millennials such as you greatly bothered by this posts are the minority on this website. How do I know? --> " +328 / -0"
Lol I'm a millennial now? Get back to posting about yesterday's news.
Edit: Just because you explained your reasoning doesn't make you correct. You did post a 2 day old story and claimed it was breaking.