Just putting some things together I’ve read. Apparently this RV was positioned near ATT infrastructure that some say were used for spying etc. Is it possible this RV was meant to be a much larger blast to destroy evidence but was droned or similar? Wild theory here but just trying to assemble possibilities based on this video.
Plastic explosives cannot be detonated by fire, it requires an electrical charge. So hitting it with a missile would only cause it to burn, not explode.
But I think the point is more that the missile was the explosion, not a VBIED. So the implication is that the vehicle was not meant to explode, it was targeted.
Yes, however, I would say that plume is going up, not coming down, so it would appear to be something launched into the air by the explosion, which emanated from the vehicle. My guess is that object is a propane tank which was used as a detonator for a fertilizer bomb, and perhaps the fuel mixture with the fertilizer was incorrect, causing a bit of a delay. I don't have experience with such bombs, so I'm only guessing, but that seems like a plausible explanation for what evidence we have. It CERTAINLY wasn't a simple gas tank explosion. But the authorities tipped that off with the evacuation warnings and the FBI and ATF getting involved.
I'm not an EOD guy or anything but in the Marines I often saw something similar when they would demo a pile of artillery shells or something. I think it might be part of the detonation process?
The first couple of explosions in this video show a similar effect
Good catch. Sure looks like a missle in the video. Rats are rats, huh? Maybe why I heard they're now investigating. Have we heard any more on Baltimore?
AT&T buildings have offices for the CIA within them. The CIA pays AT&T 10 Million a year for phone records of American citizens overseas and domestically. So it's not crazy to suspect the CIA being involved in this.
The tail end, of a projectile, or missile and so forth, goes in the opposite direction, of the projectile, especially in lower frame rate cameras as it catches things like this.
It's inconclusive. I would say it's possibly something being blown upwards due to a primary charge and that then sets off the secondary a few moments later, but I'd have to know the type of explosives used to be confident about making that call. Wild guess: it's a propane tank that was used to trigger a fertilizer type explosive charge.
IT WAS A MISSLE!!
don't think so. missiles are fast when they hit target - i doubt normal camera would even be able to catch a glimpse of one coming down.
meanwhile video has 2 second delay between white line showing up and explosion.
Also during those 2 seconds, the entire white line moves horizontally, a significant distance.
Probably two explosions. White line is debris from first explosion, cloud is from second explosion a few seconds later.
It's called wind. You can see the cloud from the explosion blowing in the same direction.
Not a missle. A large piece of debris from the initial explosion, ahead of the fireball.
These distraction stories meant to scare. Not working.
Just putting some things together I’ve read. Apparently this RV was positioned near ATT infrastructure that some say were used for spying etc. Is it possible this RV was meant to be a much larger blast to destroy evidence but was droned or similar? Wild theory here but just trying to assemble possibilities based on this video.
That's very close to my working hypothesis.. this smells of nation-state action. Some underground war just heated up.
That’s a good one!
That building was bought by Nissan last January, and nothing in Wikileaks or from Snowden suggest that building had the NSA playing inside.
Lol how would a rocket defuse a big bomb? Maybe it was a spy van that got taken out?
Plastic explosives cannot be detonated by fire, it requires an electrical charge. So hitting it with a missile would only cause it to burn, not explode.
But I think the point is more that the missile was the explosion, not a VBIED. So the implication is that the vehicle was not meant to explode, it was targeted.
interdasting...
Yes, however, I would say that plume is going up, not coming down, so it would appear to be something launched into the air by the explosion, which emanated from the vehicle. My guess is that object is a propane tank which was used as a detonator for a fertilizer bomb, and perhaps the fuel mixture with the fertilizer was incorrect, causing a bit of a delay. I don't have experience with such bombs, so I'm only guessing, but that seems like a plausible explanation for what evidence we have. It CERTAINLY wasn't a simple gas tank explosion. But the authorities tipped that off with the evacuation warnings and the FBI and ATF getting involved.
yeah after looking again i agree the plume seems to go from ground to air
I'm not an EOD guy or anything but in the Marines I often saw something similar when they would demo a pile of artillery shells or something. I think it might be part of the detonation process?
The first couple of explosions in this video show a similar effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J67oj92maC0&ab_channel=ltsimon
Yeah I’m leaning towards this.
If this footage is real, that was a rocket. I will never be convinced of anything else. If this videos real.
It very much seems to be. You can even make out a shockwave immediately after the smoke/vapor trail just before the fireball
the white line moved horizontally though - how would a rocket trail do that?
It looks like the white line is coming from the ground and the source is moving
that was a rocket
Good catch. Sure looks like a missle in the video. Rats are rats, huh? Maybe why I heard they're now investigating. Have we heard any more on Baltimore?
So... there's just some random person recording the skyline as an explosion happens to occur?
Pol has the longer video
We do have cameras everywhere these days.. this looks like a small segment of a larger video, someone likely cut out and modified from another video.
There were reports of gunfire, so maybe they heard it and filmed in the general direction?
the 15 minute audio warning may have something to do with it...
Agreed. Looks like propane bomb + a little TNT to me. Small amount of destruction for size of cloud.
AT&T buildings have offices for the CIA within them. The CIA pays AT&T 10 Million a year for phone records of American citizens overseas and domestically. So it's not crazy to suspect the CIA being involved in this.
Why would a middle go UP from the explosion?
The tail end, of a projectile, or missile and so forth, goes in the opposite direction, of the projectile, especially in lower frame rate cameras as it catches things like this.
It's not really going up. It's the frames per second illusion.
This is starting to smell like 9/11
Gang warfare when gangs have military resources.
Can we get some military folks with experience in this sort of thing in here to tell us what we might be seeing possibly?
It's inconclusive. I would say it's possibly something being blown upwards due to a primary charge and that then sets off the secondary a few moments later, but I'd have to know the type of explosives used to be confident about making that call. Wild guess: it's a propane tank that was used to trigger a fertilizer type explosive charge.
Looks like the top of something coming off under pressure.
No
Looks like a high energy beam to me.