I think the biggest problem is they never defined massive fraud. I think the first thing to do would have the law define massive be it number of people involved, number of total fraudulent votes needed to become massive, or a number of states that constitutes massive.
The media and courts are just hiding behind an undefined word. One person's idea of massive could be another person's acceptable amount of impropriety.
This is to show that if a small amount of fraud is caught then massive fraud would easily be caught. This is a deceptive manipulative article.
Ding ding ding
I think the biggest problem is they never defined massive fraud. I think the first thing to do would have the law define massive be it number of people involved, number of total fraudulent votes needed to become massive, or a number of states that constitutes massive.
The media and courts are just hiding behind an undefined word. One person's idea of massive could be another person's acceptable amount of impropriety.
There was widespread and massive fraud within a few select counties within 6 swing states.
Widespread in all precincts in said counties.
Massive in amount of votes switched, non verified ballots stuffed into then tabulators.
Exactly.
And also widespread is completely unnecessary in a system such as ours with an electoral college.
All you need is targeted fraud.
"We found Trump's so called voter fraud and here it is, nothing more to see folks, you can go home now, please disperse."