4386
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
58
TheEngineer 58 points ago +58 / -0

This is to show that if a small amount of fraud is caught then massive fraud would easily be caught. This is a deceptive manipulative article.

24
KnightKreider 24 points ago +24 / -0

Ding ding ding

13
Rtsands45 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think the biggest problem is they never defined massive fraud. I think the first thing to do would have the law define massive be it number of people involved, number of total fraudulent votes needed to become massive, or a number of states that constitutes massive.

The media and courts are just hiding behind an undefined word. One person's idea of massive could be another person's acceptable amount of impropriety.

4
DeadLivesMatter 4 points ago +4 / -0

There was widespread and massive fraud within a few select counties within 6 swing states.

Widespread in all precincts in said counties.

Massive in amount of votes switched, non verified ballots stuffed into then tabulators.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
batboy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

And also widespread is completely unnecessary in a system such as ours with an electoral college.

All you need is targeted fraud.

6
wethedownvoted 6 points ago +6 / -0

"It's all we could find" -- Democrats investigating themselves for fraud

4
johnrambo 4 points ago +4 / -0

"We found Trump's so called voter fraud and here it is, nothing more to see folks, you can go home now, please disperse."