Double standard much? š¤š¤š¤š¤ I'm starting to think they don't like Christians
(media.patriots.win)
posted ago by MartinLuther2
+1210 / -3
Comments (82)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
ā¢
Front
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
It's the not boiling a goat in milk and other stuff nobody actually cares about.
It's the part where the Talmud states that Jesus is boiling in excrement in hell, and that his mother Mary was a whore.
They never could really forgive him for flipping their tables over.
You're right.
They are still quite mad about that.
All those sheckles lost on the floor!
Let the shaeckles hit the floor
Yes. Nobody mentions the Talmud is a vile disgusting nut-rag far more sinister than the koran
Jesus only showed extreme disdain for one group of people ā the teachers of the LAW that loaded up heavy burdens on people, falsely promising them peace with God through the law. The Talmud is a giant stack of those extra laws crafted by the same sort of men as Pharisees. It is a perversion of the Torah and Psalms and Prophets.
Unlike the Koran, it's not supreme scripture, the Torah is. The Talmud occupies a place similar to the hadith, which are far worse than either the Talmud or Koran.
Typical disingenuous yid comment. Suck it, hymie
I'm Dutch/Irish and Christian, thank you very much.
Started another read last week, ugh end of leviticus, and mid numbers tedious.
Bingo. I cringe every time someone says Judeo-Christian values. There is no such thing. Fuck them.
Jesus embodied the perfection of the Law of Moses. That's why they hate him. The Jews who adopted Jewish values became Christian.
It's the neocons justifying billions to Israel every year
It's the chopping of baby dicks for zero medical/health benefits. It's not a Christian norm, yet here we are. Who is really in charge?
Oh jewish women, dated a few. The 3 I dated all threw childish temper tantrums to try and get their way and all 3 made me not want to continue seeing them after.
Also, I don't watch porn anymore, but every guy in porn is circumcised. Almost like jews control the medical and porn industry. Simply an observation.
Kek
America is predominantly Christian, it is Christian values that allow me to openly practice Judaism. I think there're a lot of Jews out there that are very appreciative that America is a Christian nation as compared to a much less religiously tolerant one.
Perhaps a lot in raw numbers; if they all showed up at your house at once, yours say 'wow, that's a lot of people, do I have enough chairs?'
As a percentage of the whole, though, it's quite small.
Tolerance is part of Christianity. We lose Christianity, we lose tolerance.
Tolerance is not a Christian virtue, nor has it ever been. Charity, compassion, justice, prudence, mercy; these are Christian virtues. To tolerate great evil is itself an evil.
Yes we should hate the sin but not the sinner.
Tolerance and apathy are the virtues of a dying society.
There isn't a single scripture in the entire bible that tells christians to tolerate and accept satanic worship. Note: Every religion that is not worshipping Jehovah is in fact worshipping Satan and his lie that there are other gods to worship. Yes I use the name of our god due to it actually specifying without doubt which "god" I'm talking about, the One True God. Our scripture does not tell us to accept satanic faiths, it tells us to convert those satanic faithful to our side. We tolerate insomuch only that we do not harm them, and we await God to handle them, but that does not mean we want them anywhere near us. Touching us with their unclean beliefs.
If you have a name for God, it's made up. & People have been arguing forever about whether Jehovah is the Father or if it's duality including the Spirit or the Trinity... Doesn't help as much as you might think.
Psalm 83: 18. Thjs scripture quite clearly indicates that god has a name. Look up the tetragrammaton. Due to the peculiarities of jewish writing we can only guess the exact pronunciation, but in english Jehovah is the standard pronunciation.
Yeah, tetragrammaton is like barely past entry level stuff man. The Bible is divinely inspired, but it's still written by man. Jehovah/Yahweh/etc somewhat useful in polytheistic arguments... The word "God" is also a "name" of God
Majority of citizens are Christian, yes.
It's not just the number of citizens who are Christian. It's in the very fabric of the founding. It's Christian values that are ingrained in every founding document, which the founding principles are built on. It is Christian values that gave us "freedom of religion" in the first place. People can say "separation of church and state" all they like, and it is important to an extent, but the one religion you cannot remove from the USA, without upending its nature and making it "USA" in name only, is Christianity. You can try, and people are trying, but it won't have the result they imagine.
The values of the nation are not based on Christian values. Don't get me wrong, many of those values are present, but the values of the Declaration and the Constitution are based upon the ideas of English Liberalism and liberty as espoused by philosophers like John Locke.
If you removed Christianity, but retained English Liberal values, the USA would go on unchanged. The separation of church and state is important because political authority corrupts any church that it is a part of, and religious authority corrupts any political entity it is a part of.
This is what troubles Islamic states. Without the separation, corrupt individuals use political and religious authority to control the populace.
I get why you believe the Christian religion is different, but people are not. It's not just that power corrupts, it's that the corrupt are drawn to power.
Our rights are blatantly stated to be granted by God, that not any authority on earth is above that is pretty important. I agree about the Anglo values though.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but which god? There are literally thousands to pick from.
Being an atheist, the "rights from god" bit doesn't convince me. Natural rights (being something that you would have in nature, without anyone else granting them to you), OTOH, fit the bill just fine. The overlap is large (that venn diagram would look like a single circle), so it's easy to agree with you on specific rights, just not the "source."
Obviously, the one Christian God which the founding fathers worshipped. This is 100% clear.
Really? Not the one the few deists (there were a few) in the room believed in? Which denomination? That's important as each denomination believes in a slightly different set of scriptures. Is it the one you like, specifically? Are the others "real" Christians, or are they the "not doing it right" kind?
As I said, I'm all for natural rights, and they overlap with what believers say are "god given," but many Christians don't think that other denominations are "real" Christians, so what does that say about those rights? The Catholic/Protestant divide exists.
This isn't snark, there is a problem calling them "god given rights" as those who believe in neither these rights nor your god can easily dismiss them. I know you probably don't like this idea, and I can sympathize.
Locke stole 'life, liberty, property' straight from Luther. Look up the 2 Kingdoms doctrine.
Also Madison's letter to Schaeffer; he credits Luther with the idea of separation of church and state and freedom of conscience.
So even religious philosophers agree with keeping political authority far, far away from religious authority?
Close but not quite. Not far, far away, but functionally separate, sure.
The Founders' thoughts on the topic are well worth a read; they anticipated that there would inevitably be small, accidental intersections of state and church and that was fine and free exercise should prevail. They were very, very strict on financial separation.
But Christianiy is the root of the very values you mentioned. It's like Christmas starting as a Christian holiday, then embedding itself as much more than a religious belief. It has become a part of our traditions and culture, even in a non-religious way, even though it started because of religion.
Christianity is not the root. Christianity shares many values with English liberalism because the Christian church lost a tremendous amount of power over people's lives and Christian values changed over time.
There are a number of values stated within the bible that are no longer held by the vast majority of Christians. The tenets or commandments stated within the bible don't hold sway anymore because we do not live as nomadic, iron age goat herders. This isn't a bad thing, as beating an unruly child on the edge of town (for example) is pretty barbaric.
Like I said, the values are shared between both sets of ideologies.
Now why would the NWO hate the one religion with a figurehead that actually fought against bankers and banned usury?
This is so common that people have began to accept it. But we shouldn't of this double stamdard
Standard crybullying. Malicious party drapes themselves in the appearance of a protected class then goes out overtly obnoxious harassing and agitating confrontation with the person they wish to harm. The first sign of push back they flop crying to the ground 'help! help! he harmed a sacred protected class! punch the Nazi!' and their ten buddies lurking in wait with daggers drawn come out from the shadows to try and destroy the innocent party. Bandit thuggery. Lies. Intimidation. Then the next day the crybully walks into a business and instead of agitating simply demands concessions to go away. This is how gender studies degrees scheme to create demand in a market with no demand for their services.
Carlos Maza was the laziest case demonstrating their cookie-cutter model. No nuance in his desperate plea for agitation while the rest of his NBC propagandists sharpened their pencils waiting for the moment to try and get decent Americans fired and left destitute.
95% of semites hate white people and 95% of US media is owned by semites. now you know why media push narrative of "white privilege" and blm ...
I think the hardest red pill would be if all non-crazies just deleted their social media accounts. Then the crazies would cannibalize each other, and, by doing so, they would realize how shitty all of their own people are.
Except they only know how to double down and pretty much never learn from anything
What an absolute idiot
I am 100% certain that western civilization has less than two generations left on the clock unless the common, working-class people get hip to the JQ PDQ
Liberalism is the religion of very many Jews.
Oy Vey! These Goys are stepping out of line!
Ironic that his panicked reaction encapsulates the initial tweet perfectly.
HELP HELP IāM A VICTIM
They only like American dollars and American soldiers dieing for their country. When are people going to realise Israel is infested as deep as China or worse.
The end goal of cancel-culture is to cancel Christ.
They attack Christians and not Islam because they know Christians won't fight back.
Lets change this
The same when it's open season on publically making fun of someone for being white.
Dude!
You're right. He was a powerful kundalini yogi.
Luke 3:16 (KJV)
Fire? Holy Ghost (Holy Spirit)...
Jesus is incredibly cool.
They killed Christ and created a non biblical religion with rabbis and synagogues to continue practicing Judaism without a temple to avoid worshiping him.
Gradually, I began to hate them.
Democrats are the party of tolerance. /s
As a jew.... this guy is a fucking embarrassment.
And just like that, no one is surprised.
This is precisely why the Vatican is so infested with communist swine.
Works alone cannot make you a Christian, but you also cannot be a Christian without following Jesus' example.
Simply asking for remission of sin and continuing to be as sinful as you want does not make you Christian. If you are truly saved you will be motivated to be better. The Holy Spirit guides those who are saved.|
God is aware if one is sincere in their repentance.
Matthew 7:1-3
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
As far as I know, it's pretty unChristian to gate keep Christianity, how do you know the extent of his effort? Or what's in his heart? You don't, you can only project your own and claim it theirs.
I'm not gatekeeping. Observing reality isn't a "gatekeep".
Besides I'm not in a position to gatekeep anything, God is the ultimate gate keeper.
I don't which is why I said - "God is aware if one is sincere in their repentance."
God knows the extent of our efforts.
Fair enough.
I guess I see it as a binary thing, people truly believe, or they are some variant of Pascal's Wager.
In saying all this, I don't personally agree with people who join a religion or practice a religion then pick and choose commonly accepted and practiced parts of that religion.
This assumes that all people are privy to the same level of information.
One of the main reasons that only God can judge is only God can be aware of the circumstances behind your level of belief and the sincerity.
I think salvation is a journey. As long as people are taking the steps I think they are on the right path.
Though I agree one cannot be saved by simply doing "X" every Sunday but without actually taking the steps to become closer to God.
That is only 1/2 of the formula. A man that bears no fruit is not saved.
What kind of fruit does a transvestite produce?
She bears some twigs and berries.