307
Comments (22)
sorted by:
13
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

The large building, circled in red, to the south, 333 Commerce, is the "Batman" building, the AT&T Building. I do not think that was the target of the bomb.

The building just a block to the north, on 2nd Avenue, has always belonged to AT&T, and I believe has always housed INFRASTRUCTURE of some kind. It has never been open to the public to my knowledge.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
PresidentErectHunter 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is the bottom line? What are you suggesting?

Have not been following this story.

6
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

That the bombing was an attack on communications infrastructure. Exactly what for, I don’t have a guess.

9
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

Also, it's now coming out that human remains have been found near the scene of the explosion. I think the fact that they were only able to find them 10-12 hours after the blast is testimony to the destructive power of the bomb.

Human remains found near explosion site.

Also, reports are coming in that this thing broke windows *5 miles * away.

6
Tucso 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, huge outages are occurring

6
Jack_Burton 6 points ago +6 / -0

What’s under the asphalt there?

7
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Every once in a while, there are archeological digs under 2nd or the buildings on 2nd.

The street is ancient, one of the first laid out in a city founded about 1780. The current standing buildings along that part of 2nd I would say range from 100-150 years old.

As far as I ever knew, it was mostly cobblestones and the remains of old cellars from commercial buildings, some of which are older than the current buildings.

It's entirely possible, though, that AT&T building immediately onsite could have infrastructure placed below street level. I don't know for sure.

3
Pinko10 3 points ago +4 / -1

So chick on Twitter posted that her dad contacted the FBI bc he has a boutique hotel with footage of the entire blast area and that the RV was there at least 1 1/2 days. I mean, really? If true, everyone in that neighborhood would’ve seen it and probably complained don’t you think?

6
HarryxD 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it was the big drab one with few to no windows, it has something to do with the NSA. No joke. It's some kind of data collection center They did a documentary about it a while back. Those are in a lot of major cities, most notably NYC. On a side note, the other ATT building in Nashville looks an awful lot like an owl, does it not? What ancient owl spirit could that be based on?

3
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Drab, almost windowless, 1960s utilitarian architecture describes that building well. This was the bomb’s target I think.

The bigger, modern AT&T building, what locals call the “Batman Building” does indeed look like an owl.

5
MAGAliths45 5 points ago +5 / -0

So working theory trying to knock out infrastructure or servers that have done or contained baddy shit?

5
WU_HAN_FRU [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Working theory.

Or possibly just to knock them out to hamper comms generally or for specific people.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not the first.

4
Lioncat331 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m thinking I’m going to terminate my ATT contract. 🤔

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
basket_of_patriots 4 points ago +4 / -0

A chance to clean out docs in the building.

1
TheLegendDJT 1 point ago +1 / -0

I heard there were lots of phone outages for ATT phone and even cable customers after the blast. If connected to the explosion, what was that building being used for?