12
posted ago by OKRancher ago by OKRancher +12 / -0

My semi estranged brother(commie) works for a congressman. He told me no fraud occurred and insinuated he could refute anything I could say. Long story short, he said if I convince him fraud occurred in the election he would talk to the congressman. I figure I have seen almost all of the evidence but am asking for help. What is the most irrefutable evidence?

Post links if possible. I’m sending him an email Sunday.

Comments (35)
sorted by:
4
675-EVIL 4 points ago +4 / -0

The best source incl. documentation is in the Navarro Report. He works for Trump.

https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/the-navarro-report-the-immaculate-deception/

2
TheDarkstar 2 points ago +2 / -0

450,000+ ballots in battleground cities had a vote for only Biden. No down ballot votes cast, no independents, green party or write in candidates voted for on those ballots.

Number of people who voted ONLY for Joe Biden and didn’t vote further down the ticket: Pennsylvania — 98,000 Georgia — 80-90,000 Arizona — 42,000 Michigan — 69- 115,000 Wisconsin — 62,836

2
TheDarkstar 2 points ago +2 / -0

The MOUNTAIN of election fraud evidence (takes a few seconds to load). https://hereistheevidence.com/

1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. I book marked that the other day and am planning on going through it with a fine tooth comb.

1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Four Videos – Four States Where Votes Were Switched Live on TV Away from President Trump to Biden https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/four-videos-four-states-votes-switched-live-tv-away-president-trump-biden/

1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m looking for something 100% irrefutable. He’s very smart, brainwashed, and hates Trump. I imagine he’ll just say that was an error on the station’s part. This is going to be like curing TDS.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I plan on sending him those. I’m sure he’ll say it’s not enough to make a difference. I see no way to dispute them. Hopefully he hasn’t seen them and is still an honest man.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was live video feed and can be found other places too.

1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Zuckerberg‘s spent $419 Million to Improperly Influenced Election.

1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

A Good List Of The Many Election Fraud Hearings.

Before you watch the many Hearings on Election Issues, Please take a minute and listen to some very powerful words from Mr. Scott Adams.

The 2020 election was #NonTransparent by force #Bullying to cheat https://youtu.be/rNM3K0cH2tc

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks. Good stuff in there. I forgot about Pennsylvania.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did. I will include that.

1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Swing states to stop counting on election night when Trump was winning.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think he’ll believe testimony. He’s a numbers guy.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll look at them. I haven’t heard of those before.

1
Serioussurfaholic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well I can tell you the AZ hearings had 2 numbers guys testifying and they showed numbers. Well technically one major numbers geek and one computer dude that explained both numbers and network stuff.

1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks. I’ll check it out. I’m not sure I watched that one.

1
Serioussurfaholic 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's about 9 hours IIRC. But there was one hyper math dude, and one more polished and professional numbers and computer dude with really good graphics. And a bunch of other people testifying under oath.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Observers were not allowed during the original count or the recount. There is no defense for this and intrinsically implies that elections officials had something to hide.

1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. I’m trying to convince someone that doesn’t want to know the truth. He’ll come up with some bullshit excuse.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Serioussurfaholic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well if he will come up with bullshit excuses for states violating their own Constitutions AND laws there is no hope for him. And several states did just that.

1
OKRancher [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He wants to believe anything except that Trump won. That’s why I need something that you can’t come up with a bullshit explanation for.

2
Serioussurfaholic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well then, I would say the data dudes, and the actual violations of state constitutions and laws. Prove the elections themselves, in several key states, were illegal. Therefore, the electors being certified is also, by default illegal.

Does he not think it odd that NY sent certified electors, when they were still counting? They found MORE votes for a democrat rep to oust a republican rep sometime this past week.

1
TheDarkstar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Antrim County Michigan Forensics Report on Dominion Voting Machines: https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report

Every Legal Vote: www.everylegalvote.com

Joe Cheated: www.joecheated.com

Audit The Election: https://audittheelection.com/

Matt Braynard's Election Fraud Findings: https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11/19/the-results-from-matt-braynards-study-that-pedes-crowdfunded-in-6-days-are-damning-stunning-and-horrifying/