102
Comments (24)
sorted by:
5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
5
maga_gal 5 points ago +7 / -2

Was it actually shitty? Because the first one was really good. No wokeness at all, which is why I loved it.

3
Red37 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was poorly done. Didn’t notice any woke ness but I think it could have been edited better. It was long, kind of predictable, and frankly, not really all that fun for most of it.

-2
KungFluPanda187 -2 points ago +4 / -6

If you really liked the first one, you'll like this one. Maybe not as much but WW1984 is definitely worth watching if you liked the first one.

1
Red37 1 point ago +2 / -1

Disagree. 6/10. Poorly executed.

2
SickIcarus 2 points ago +3 / -1

Disagree. 2/10. Horribly executed. Worst sequel to an amazing first movie since Matrix 2 - and WW84 is much, much worse than that. 2.5 hours of your life that you’ll never get back. Such a massive disappointment.

0
maga_gal 0 points ago +3 / -3

People are so quick to attack something because it seems convenient to do so. Sorry you got the downvote :/

2
KungFluPanda187 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone has their own opinion so it's all good. I personally thought it was good but I can understand why people didn't like it.

5
trevortheshone 5 points ago +7 / -2

That is a shame. I could watch her face all day.

Fortunately for hollywood, chyna is footing the bill, so they really loose nothing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
1
SickIcarus 1 point ago +2 / -1

She puts out any more stinkers like this and it’s only a matter of time. 🙏

1
Red37 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just saw it. I didn’t think it had many real social justice slant; but it was just kind of a meh movie. 6/10. I wouldn’t recommend paying to see it in a theater.

1
MAGALogic 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think the pacing was off with this movie IMO.

4
Red37 4 points ago +4 / -0

Needed more editing. Maybe the snider cut, oh never mind.

1
SickIcarus 1 point ago +1 / -0

That definitely would have helped, but I don’t know how much it would’ve saved it. Maybe brought it from a 2/10 to a 6/10?

-2
KungFluPanda187 -2 points ago +4 / -6

Was not woke at all. I watched it earlier today. Only problem was that the CGI was kinda shitty and Cheetah got little to no screen time. Overall, it was pretty good.

8
Harken_X 8 points ago +9 / -1

Not woke? My understanding is that the director deliberately modeled the main villain after Trump, played by Pedro Pascal, a blatantly known hater of the president.

3
SauronWasFramed 3 points ago +5 / -2

It was a bad imitation of Ronald Reagan.

2
Red37 2 points ago +2 / -0

People online have said that but I didn’t get Trump vibes from him at all.

1
KungFluPanda187 1 point ago +3 / -2

If they trying to model the villain after Trump, then they did a shitty job because i didn't see it at all.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
1
swarleybing 1 point ago +2 / -1

If you look at the movie from a leftists perspective, they based it on their warped perception of Trump. The first time we see Maxwell Lord, someone describes him as "a businessman and tv personality". He's on TV lying to everyone and making empty promises, only gaining any success through "cheating". Its quite clearly porn for the orangemanbad brigade.

-2
KungFluPanda187 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Nope, he was absolutely nothing like him. Not even close.

-4
Grindelwald -4 points ago +1 / -5

So Breitbart is no Rottentomatoes? Ok, well they have “jumped the shark” then.