Yes, stood the test of time. 15 centuries of more or less continuous progress, and the best societies ever produced. Do tell me about the great pagan countries out there and their achievements.
A mass apostasy is foretold in the Bible in the end times. It makes no difference, Jesus wins.
lol, modern humans thinking 15 centuries is some big thing still. As if the Gods didn't help Egypt alone prosper for almost over double that time.
Rome made the bed rock of foundation, that people to this day kept trying to return to. Nothing christians made lead to good societies, it was only ever a constant attemps to return back to what made rome great, and remove the disgusting church elements. Literally every time we advanced as a society in Europe, it was a specific rejection of the church. You people still don't realize the obvious.
And your rabbi "jewsus" already lost. You're going to end up waring against isreal once they show their true colors either this decade or the next, then the rabbi jewsus will no longer be able to keep tricking white people into believing him, and all your children will return to the Gods as it was in the era of antiquity.
Your childish brainwashing won't make "winning" for that rabbi that wants you enslaved any more likely.
It's amazing that you even think the sole factor here is "christianity" not "which one did the bidding of their masters better".
Of course Egypt "got soft" they were attacked by "isrealites" and had their cultures, and tech destroyed.
And it was way better ruled by Priests btw. The Gods choose their champions well, only the fucking isrealites who hated egypt wrote lies about them.
Also, much more than 1000 years in a row, last I check, is doing a lot fucking better than we are right now, now ain't we?
Egypt didn't go soft, they were blindsinded by attacks they couldn't have foreseen, due to the nature of occult warfare.
And Rome was literally destroyed because christians subverted their pagan culture, using the same fucking tactics as commies today, and rewrote history to cover their tracks. That's like saying "oh the commies did so well, cuz they lasted longer than national socialism, so ergo communism better, dur hur"
Your metrics of success are all sorts of fucked up.
Seriously, this "wow the christian nations surived so long" is both silly, and hardly stands up to scrutinity. The White Supremacists explanation of genetics makes more sense than this.
The Church holding back science for centuries did far more harm to our "advancement" if you can even call it that.
That's factually crap. The Egyptians fell apart as a civilisation once before the Hebrews even existed as a people and the second time they fell apart was not due to Israel either.
It goes:
Old Kingdom 3000 BC to 2150 BC,
First Intermediate Period (i.e. collapse) 2150 - 2000 BC,
Middle Kingdom 2000 - 1600 BC, Second Intermediate Period 1600 - 1500 BC,
New Kingdom 1500 - 1100 BC
Third Intermediate Period 1100 BC - 650 BC
Late period 650 BC - Roman times.
So, 'facts' you've spouted:
"Egypt had 3000 continuous years of progress" No. It managed 1000 years one time.
"It was better when the priests ruled" No. The Intermediate periods were low points. Egypt lost wars and produced nothing notable.
"It's the isrealites". No. It's spelled Israelites, and they didn't even come into being as a nation until 1500 BC. The Egyptians were conquered by Libyans, Persians, Nubians, Greeks, and Romans. It's possible but unlikely that the Hyksos had something to do with Israel, but they were more likely Philistines.
Yes, stood the test of time. 15 centuries of more or less continuous progress, and the best societies ever produced. Do tell me about the great pagan countries out there and their achievements.
A mass apostasy is foretold in the Bible in the end times. It makes no difference, Jesus wins.
lol, modern humans thinking 15 centuries is some big thing still. As if the Gods didn't help Egypt alone prosper for almost over double that time.
Rome made the bed rock of foundation, that people to this day kept trying to return to. Nothing christians made lead to good societies, it was only ever a constant attemps to return back to what made rome great, and remove the disgusting church elements. Literally every time we advanced as a society in Europe, it was a specific rejection of the church. You people still don't realize the obvious.
And your rabbi "jewsus" already lost. You're going to end up waring against isreal once they show their true colors either this decade or the next, then the rabbi jewsus will no longer be able to keep tricking white people into believing him, and all your children will return to the Gods as it was in the era of antiquity.
Your childish brainwashing won't make "winning" for that rabbi that wants you enslaved any more likely.
Oh, Egypt prospered for 30 centuries in a row, did they? Never went soft and got conquered? Never got ruled by priests and bureaucrats?
If you're going to pretend to be some sort of authority on Egypt, it might pay you to have at least heard of the Intermediate periods.
Egypt never managed much more than 1000 years in a row, they had to rebuild three times.
PS The Western Roman Empire was mixed Christian / pagan. The Eastern Empire was Christian. Which one fell over 1000 years before the other?
It's amazing that you even think the sole factor here is "christianity" not "which one did the bidding of their masters better".
Of course Egypt "got soft" they were attacked by "isrealites" and had their cultures, and tech destroyed.
And it was way better ruled by Priests btw. The Gods choose their champions well, only the fucking isrealites who hated egypt wrote lies about them.
Also, much more than 1000 years in a row, last I check, is doing a lot fucking better than we are right now, now ain't we?
Egypt didn't go soft, they were blindsinded by attacks they couldn't have foreseen, due to the nature of occult warfare.
And Rome was literally destroyed because christians subverted their pagan culture, using the same fucking tactics as commies today, and rewrote history to cover their tracks. That's like saying "oh the commies did so well, cuz they lasted longer than national socialism, so ergo communism better, dur hur"
Your metrics of success are all sorts of fucked up.
Seriously, this "wow the christian nations surived so long" is both silly, and hardly stands up to scrutinity. The White Supremacists explanation of genetics makes more sense than this.
The Church holding back science for centuries did far more harm to our "advancement" if you can even call it that.
"Literally every time we advanced as a society in Europe, it was a specific rejection of the church. You people still don't realize the obvious."
OK, mister historical expert, which centuries did Europe advance in between 500 and 2000 AD, and how was the church rejected in that century?
I eagerly await your ad hom or blatant dodge of the question.
PS If Christianity destroyed Rome, why did the Eastern Empire at Constantinople last another 1000 years?
That's factually crap. The Egyptians fell apart as a civilisation once before the Hebrews even existed as a people and the second time they fell apart was not due to Israel either.
It goes: Old Kingdom 3000 BC to 2150 BC, First Intermediate Period (i.e. collapse) 2150 - 2000 BC, Middle Kingdom 2000 - 1600 BC, Second Intermediate Period 1600 - 1500 BC, New Kingdom 1500 - 1100 BC Third Intermediate Period 1100 BC - 650 BC Late period 650 BC - Roman times.
So, 'facts' you've spouted: