How? Dems just have to launch another Kavanaugh campaign on steroids, this time with ample faked evidence, so the GOP can't "in good conscience" confirm the pick. Or they let it be delayed with "investigations" until it's too late.
I'm guessing the Supreme Court's not as much of a factor as we thought.
No it wouldn't, everyone already expected Dems to stonewall and any ammunition against the nominee would have rallied their base. Dems protesting someone incontestable wakes more people up than Dems protesting someone MAGA.
The only people that would wake up is people who are already awake. The supreme court is technically supposed to be non-partisan. The easiest way to object to a nominee is to question their impartiality. A lot of conservatives don't want judges legislating either. Anyway, it's useless hypotheticals at this point.
And who was Trump supposed to pick instead of RCB? If he picked someone MAGA then the republicans would not have voted them in.
Exposed doesn't mean anything anymore. Look at all the evidence exposed about election fraud, yet nothing tangible has happened.
How? Dems just have to launch another Kavanaugh campaign on steroids, this time with ample faked evidence, so the GOP can't "in good conscience" confirm the pick. Or they let it be delayed with "investigations" until it's too late.
I'm guessing the Supreme Court's not as much of a factor as we thought.
No it wouldn't, everyone already expected Dems to stonewall and any ammunition against the nominee would have rallied their base. Dems protesting someone incontestable wakes more people up than Dems protesting someone MAGA.
The only people that would wake up is people who are already awake. The supreme court is technically supposed to be non-partisan. The easiest way to object to a nominee is to question their impartiality. A lot of conservatives don't want judges legislating either. Anyway, it's useless hypotheticals at this point.