There are tons of shills in the comments over there. But in their own twisted way they make a good point, even if they are wrong. We have to start making progress. We have to. It’s too easy to dismiss claims of fraud when absolutely no judge agrees. It’s like Obamagate. If Democrats broke the law, if they spied illegally on trumps campaign, if they lied to obtain warrants, why aren’t any of them sitting in prison right now?
A couple of them make some pretty good arguments. Why haven’t the affidavits really shown up in court? There’s a reason, what is it?
A lot of the stuff our team is calling “proof“ is actually just very compelling evidence. Compelling evidence is not proof. Why are we not seeing this “proof“? Where is it?
You may say that you’ve seen it, but most Republicans I ask can’t even articulate to me what this proof actually is. That’s a sign of very bad marketing. Yes, I said marketing.
If the situation were reversed and they were accusing us of election fraud, every single fucking Democrat in the country would know what the talking points are, they would have two or three pinpoint accusations boilEd down to one or two sentences that they all repeated over and over again until the nation at large believed them. You ask 50 Republicans what the proof of Democrat fraud is and you get 50 different answers.
Dem fags are very good at getting out in front of stories, setting the narrative, and creating doubt.
They are incredibly good at marketing themselves and their ideas. I look around and I see the republican party is run by old men with no new ideas who have absolutely no idea how to market themselves in the mass media. The Republican Party needs to get younger and very quickly. Or we are in big trouble.
Utter nonsense. How can one utter such stupidity? Why isn’t the proof shown: because the court does not want to see it (you know how a court hearing works right? You talk and then you can show the proof is the judge agrees). The video in Georgia is proof. They plus the stats, it’s more than proof enough. Pollsters being kept out is proof that he counting was not done properly - which is against the LAW. Cardboard boxes on windows same problem. I know you’re not a Trump supporter but I am replying cos you sound sincere enough. Go see Rudy’s podcasts. All of the proofs there. Why do the Dems control the narrative. Why? Because they control the media, which Dems read. Change that and everything changes. P.S. you might want to wonder why you don’t believe in a video you see? Two actually, the other one being of an official telling pollsters to count the wrong ballots anyway.
Proofs are for math and liquor... and unethical propagandists.
The real world uses evidence.
And there's only one talking point we need: if the system won't give us a legitimate election, it's time to pick up arms and dissolve the compacts between government and citizens. The sooner the better, we're foreign-controlled even if Trump keeps his office.
There are tons of shills in the comments over there. But in their own twisted way they make a good point, even if they are wrong. We have to start making progress. We have to. It’s too easy to dismiss claims of fraud when absolutely no judge agrees. It’s like Obamagate. If Democrats broke the law, if they spied illegally on trumps campaign, if they lied to obtain warrants, why aren’t any of them sitting in prison right now?
A couple of them make some pretty good arguments. Why haven’t the affidavits really shown up in court? There’s a reason, what is it?
A lot of the stuff our team is calling “proof“ is actually just very compelling evidence. Compelling evidence is not proof. Why are we not seeing this “proof“? Where is it?
You may say that you’ve seen it, but most Republicans I ask can’t even articulate to me what this proof actually is. That’s a sign of very bad marketing. Yes, I said marketing.
If the situation were reversed and they were accusing us of election fraud, every single fucking Democrat in the country would know what the talking points are, they would have two or three pinpoint accusations boilEd down to one or two sentences that they all repeated over and over again until the nation at large believed them. You ask 50 Republicans what the proof of Democrat fraud is and you get 50 different answers.
Dem fags are very good at getting out in front of stories, setting the narrative, and creating doubt.
They are incredibly good at marketing themselves and their ideas. I look around and I see the republican party is run by old men with no new ideas who have absolutely no idea how to market themselves in the mass media. The Republican Party needs to get younger and very quickly. Or we are in big trouble.
because da courts literally havent heard any cases yet. they dismiss it them without seeing evidence.
because proof and evidence are da same thing goofy
homie are u a cia shill bot? or just part of da regular 50 cent army ??
Utter nonsense. How can one utter such stupidity? Why isn’t the proof shown: because the court does not want to see it (you know how a court hearing works right? You talk and then you can show the proof is the judge agrees). The video in Georgia is proof. They plus the stats, it’s more than proof enough. Pollsters being kept out is proof that he counting was not done properly - which is against the LAW. Cardboard boxes on windows same problem. I know you’re not a Trump supporter but I am replying cos you sound sincere enough. Go see Rudy’s podcasts. All of the proofs there. Why do the Dems control the narrative. Why? Because they control the media, which Dems read. Change that and everything changes. P.S. you might want to wonder why you don’t believe in a video you see? Two actually, the other one being of an official telling pollsters to count the wrong ballots anyway.
Proofs are for math and liquor... and unethical propagandists.
The real world uses evidence.
And there's only one talking point we need: if the system won't give us a legitimate election, it's time to pick up arms and dissolve the compacts between government and citizens. The sooner the better, we're foreign-controlled even if Trump keeps his office.
Lots of us are intellectually biased so a one sentence summary doesn't cut it, we launch into a Navarro-type treatise.