“ Look for real, I’ll stop trolling for a second. I would be interested in an actual, non confrontational conversation. I am concerned however, such a conversation would take a prohibitively long amount of time to just end up nowhere (I believe it will for a myriad of reasons). I’m also not sure what the conversation would even consist of. The only thing you and I seem to have common ground on is the 2nd amendment.

I am particularly unsure if you’re capable of arguing in good faith. As both you and Alex have demonstrated an unwillingness to state an opinion for fear of reprisal, which is legitimate. Regardless, I personally believe reprisal is not only moral, but mandatory in the case of your previous demonstrated willingness to wholeheartedly hold legitimately white supremacist viewpoints. For example, stonetoss not being racist or your belief minorities were legitimately less intelligent than white people. Since science shows this is far from the case empirically, one has to wonder how you arrived at that opinion in the first place. I personally think there is no way you arrived at that viewpoint empirically, which only leaves personal bias/prejudice as the deciding factor. Had you just said “I think minorities are less intelligent than white people” from the get-go, I would’ve been more than happy to show you the mountains of evidence to the contrary and we could’ve gotten to the conclusion much more efficiently. But no, you kept playing word games and would never actually take any sort of stance. This comes across as incredibly disingenuous and makes me question your motives.

Since the election has already been called and certified (to my knowledge I may be incorrect, please tell me) and all suits have been rejected by literally every court in the land that got a case. I feel debating the election is worthless. Rather I’d like to understand your exact philosophy. Once we understand each other’s actual stances, we can determine what could be discussed.”