2928
#Audit_Congress (media.patriots.win) 🚔 PARTY OF CRIME 🚔
posted ago by vv33cl ago by vv33cl +2928 / -0
Comments (36)
sorted by:
59
shadypollster 59 points ago +59 / -0

They should be audited every year.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
43
obamagavemeaphone 43 points ago +44 / -1

Her husband is a hedge fund manager. He's the money man. That being said I'm certain he does so well based on insider tips....

21
SirReginald 21 points ago +21 / -0

Audit all family members who are considered non-arms-length.

12
deplorabillybot 12 points ago +12 / -0

Nancy's and Dianne's husbands make millions when these two force legislation through that benefits their husband's companies.

8
SteelMongoose 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's actually legal for members of Congress to do that. Guess who passed the law that made it so?

27
Bronski 27 points ago +27 / -0

I am waiting for one of these hackers to go after the "people" in Congress.

(Hear a knock on my door after someone does this.)

5
2
Bronski 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn, they found my nooses in the RV...in minecraft.

1
rootGoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

The nation/state-based hackers already do.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
15
Tharin 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is tax fraud all of us would be in jail. I'm sick of two different rules one for deplorables and one for the elite. Let's audit the relatives and families of the elected officials PAST AND PRESENT. I'll gotten gains should be taken away. Is it Communism, NO its justice one rule for all...

9
rootGoose 9 points ago +9 / -0

The circumstantial evidence alone would have us convicted.

But not them.

To Hell with that.

6
GontMawr 6 points ago +6 / -0

These people have been in power so long they have made rules and they pay people so they don't have to pay taxes. I can bet she has all the paperwork to show its all "legit". The problem is conflicts of interest, which again with all the money changing hands will be hard if not impossible to prove. These people got too comfy when capital punishment was taken away.

6
d3plor4ble 6 points ago +7 / -1

Feinstein first

6
vv33cl [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ilhan Omar

5
Lamech_Slade 5 points ago +5 / -0
  1. People (including their spouses and their minor children) running for or holding public office should be barred from purchasing or trading any publicly traded stocks or bonds.
  2. People running for or holding public office should have to place any business they own into a trust or transfer to a (non spouse) family member.
  3. People running for or holding public office should be required to publicly post their tax returns each year they are in office and for 10 years after their term ends. Statements for all bank accounts associated with any immediate family members should be required to be posted monthly while in office.
  4. People holding public office should be barred from using or transferring campaign funds to anyone or to any other campaign/charity/business. Any funds not used in a single election cycle should by law be required to be refunded to the donors based on prorating the overall % used. (if you gave $1000 and campaign used 90% overall, you would get & 100 back). No rollovers to the next campaign.
  5. People holding public office should be barred by law from employing or paying any family member or a business fully/partially owned by a family member for any service to the campaign.
  6. Violation of any of these rules or any existing campaign finance laws shall result in becoming permanently ineligible for hold or run for office. Violations are defined as civil or criminal, ie. beyond reasonable doubt is NOT required to be permanently banned from office.
  7. Individual citizens (residents of the appropriate district) have standing to sue for any and all suspicious activity. Those holding office must pay for legal defense fees from their own pockets unless the claims are frivolous.

If you can't abide by these rules, don't run for office.

Also term limits

5
Stevo182 5 points ago +5 / -0

How can anyone with that much money claim to represent the people? Dont get me wrong, i know Trump is loaded, but this has been a trend of congress for far too long.

7
SheDoc 7 points ago +7 / -0

Especially when they steal it from the people.

3
Ek69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump was a billionaire before going into office. He actually has lost over 700 million being in office. He donated his salary for office to charities. I just heard he paid out of his own money for one of the states to do a recount. Of course they didn't do it correctly even then. The man is a Saint.

4
SheDoc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have to admit, Trump has set a high standard, the right standard. He serves at the pleasure of the people without a paycheck (gives it back to the people) and stopped business deals that could even be considered questionable. Have ANY of the congressional members followed his lead?

3
factsOverFeels 3 points ago +3 / -0

How was her father again?

2
Headline_Correction 2 points ago +2 / -0

16 M for properties, that's WAY low - her house in SF is worth that alone...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ObamaSucks 1 point ago +1 / -0

TRAITOR !

1
Maga714dude 1 point ago +1 / -0

When CNN use to actually report on news https://youtu.be/nriHKFF1hUs

1
Cavalier21x 1 point ago +1 / -0

When these positions were originally created, spouses (women, since it was all men in office) did not work, and "able" years of life were generally much shorter so you did not have children and grandchildren striking off in business while dad (again, only men for most of our history) was still in offer.

Further, add technology making it extremely quick and easy to connect with anyone on a deal. Then add no changes to corruption laws. BINGO!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
massivehairycleaner 1 point ago +1 / -0

CHY-NA

1
myswedishfriend 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her finances should be audited. But reeee'ing about tax returns is retarded on its face. If you were doing something fraudulent, why would you claim that on your tax returns?

1
FnuLnu 1 point ago +1 / -0

FOIA

1
Latinalover 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seize it all. Give it back to the people. Firing squad her.

1
RamboToaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pelosi is treasonous. She has multiple times made decisions against the will of, and often even against the best interest of the People, in favor of political gain and/or monetary gain. She has been nothing less than seditious, calling on rioters and politicians to subvert the will of the U.S. President. Pelosi holds a firm grip on a vast network of wealthy donators to the DNC, and holds outsized influence on, and thus outsized responsibility for, the direction of the Democratic Party which has repeatedly conspired to undermine the God-given and Constitutional rights of the People.

1
deplorabillybot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lobbyists and "foreign aid". Case closed.