I have no interest in anything that doesn't result in a moral, functioning society. Things that actively result in an immoral, dysfunctional society should either beware or be silent. I want them rooted out and destroyed, because the posterity that we leave behind for our children is more important than their degeneracy.
Not quite yet. We don't have child brothels, mother-daughter brothels, or bestiality brothels operating legally, and paying taxes yet. We've sure got a lot of the other garbage though.
The child brothels exist, they are in the basements of Muslim immigrants. And the police has decided to ignore for literally no other reason than being scared of being labeled racists.
Those aren't child brothels, it's still criminal in the UK and the west. Even if the police are so cucked that the country that gave birth to modern policing should hang their head in shame.
What people yourself included don't understand is that Weimar got so bad, that the government legalized child prostitution and child brothels. They operated at the behest of the government and the government collected taxes on it. Just think on that a second.
Then think on this meme from /pol/ "And one day for no reason at all, people voted Hitler." Things start to become a bit clearer when you realize just how bad things got.
Sadly it was a thing. Things got really bad there, if you think things are bad now? Not even close. The middle class, and even the lower-upper class and parts of the middle-upper class collapsed. Around 70% of the population fell directly into poverty, the upper class, and ultra rich though? They made a mint and held onto power.
There's a real reason why that meme is literal truth.
Not even close, no. Anarchy is a different axis from the Western political spectrum. Right and left define what kind of governance and what philosophy is behind said governance, more than they do how much.
Right is typically thought of as being such because they oppose the constant growth of government power that would occur under leftism, but that does not imply that the right itself is anarchic.
You're much further away than I am, because you're using the contemporary 'definitions', ie the modified and invalid ones. Size of government has nothing to do with it.
Right-wing refers to a civic perspective that places value on individuality and tradition. This can either be achieved by using the government to enforce tradition and uphold individual liberty, which requires strong government, or by throwing out the government altogether and letting the natural order sort out what hierarchies and traditions remain through individual agency.
The former is referred to as a traditional conservative, and the latter a far-right extremist. Both are right-wing, and both have dramatically different views on the scope and power of government.
25 years later, turns out that wasn't enough and they demand not only praise for it, but active participation and assistance from the rest of us. Oh, and they want to "outreach" to kids all the way down to preschool.
I mind them now, because they WOULDN'T do their own thing in private.
"What I do in private is my own business. I don't care if you accept it."
"I'm coming out and telling the world what I do in private! I don't care if you accept it."
"I'm proud of what I do in private. It's not hurting you and you need to accept it!"
"I'm very, very proud of what I do in private, and you need to accept it or you're a bigot!"
"I'm so f--king proud of what I do in private, and you're not only going to accept it, but you're going to support it or else you'll never have a job anywhere again!"
Actually, yes, that would work, but the perps would go to jail. Once there's a slight chance of getting away with it, expect to see it happen across the country. See you in hell!
See, I actually am a far right extremist.
I have no interest in anything that doesn't result in a moral, functioning society. Things that actively result in an immoral, dysfunctional society should either beware or be silent. I want them rooted out and destroyed, because the posterity that we leave behind for our children is more important than their degeneracy.
We are peak Weimar Republic our culture will poison us completely. It’s later than you think.
Not quite yet. We don't have child brothels, mother-daughter brothels, or bestiality brothels operating legally, and paying taxes yet. We've sure got a lot of the other garbage though.
Leftists would totally get behind public executions of "neo-nazis" and anti-vaxxers, too. At least they like to say so on social media all the time.
Kinda funny on that one too, they'll line up hard screeching that the death penalty is bad.
Leftists do what they're told.
May I introduce you to the United Kingdom?
The child brothels exist, they are in the basements of Muslim immigrants. And the police has decided to ignore for literally no other reason than being scared of being labeled racists.
Those aren't child brothels, it's still criminal in the UK and the west. Even if the police are so cucked that the country that gave birth to modern policing should hang their head in shame.
What people yourself included don't understand is that Weimar got so bad, that the government legalized child prostitution and child brothels. They operated at the behest of the government and the government collected taxes on it. Just think on that a second.
Then think on this meme from /pol/ "And one day for no reason at all, people voted Hitler." Things start to become a bit clearer when you realize just how bad things got.
Sadly it was a thing. Things got really bad there, if you think things are bad now? Not even close. The middle class, and even the lower-upper class and parts of the middle-upper class collapsed. Around 70% of the population fell directly into poverty, the upper class, and ultra rich though? They made a mint and held onto power.
There's a real reason why that meme is literal truth.
Tiktok is more destructive en mass. There’s no such thing as privacy anymore socially across the board
Social media is the cancer that destroys a civilization.
Online brothels are de facto ones.
And they're flooded.
Far-right is an actual anarchist, not the definitionally-modified 'anarchist' you see tossed around today.
Not even close, no. Anarchy is a different axis from the Western political spectrum. Right and left define what kind of governance and what philosophy is behind said governance, more than they do how much.
Right is typically thought of as being such because they oppose the constant growth of government power that would occur under leftism, but that does not imply that the right itself is anarchic.
You're much further away than I am, because you're using the contemporary 'definitions', ie the modified and invalid ones. Size of government has nothing to do with it.
Right-wing refers to a civic perspective that places value on individuality and tradition. This can either be achieved by using the government to enforce tradition and uphold individual liberty, which requires strong government, or by throwing out the government altogether and letting the natural order sort out what hierarchies and traditions remain through individual agency.
The former is referred to as a traditional conservative, and the latter a far-right extremist. Both are right-wing, and both have dramatically different views on the scope and power of government.
No, I'm using the absolutely ancient definitions, from back when this was first started two centuries ago.
Back then, the left stood for anarchy and tyranny both. The right stood for Christian monarchism.
Hence why I never had any.
I don't mind degenerates who do their own thing in private.
That was the prevailing attitude 25 years ago.
25 years later, turns out that wasn't enough and they demand not only praise for it, but active participation and assistance from the rest of us. Oh, and they want to "outreach" to kids all the way down to preschool.
I mind them now, because they WOULDN'T do their own thing in private.
I don't just wanna sodomize my boyfriend but your kids also....that is where we've gotten to.
Muh slippery slope was real after all.
And keep it that way.
"What I do in private is my own business. I don't care if you accept it."
"I'm coming out and telling the world what I do in private! I don't care if you accept it."
"I'm proud of what I do in private. It's not hurting you and you need to accept it!"
"I'm very, very proud of what I do in private, and you need to accept it or you're a bigot!"
"I'm so f--king proud of what I do in private, and you're not only going to accept it, but you're going to support it or else you'll never have a job anywhere again!"
Give me your cute child’s booty bigot!
Why won't you date a transvestite bigot!
You get what you tolerate. Also, tolerance is the last stages of a dying society. Intolerance is beautiful.
If they ever actually kept it to themselves, I would agree. But I've seen no evidence that this is actually possible.
Your fate is the rope.
Alabama windchimes mother fucker
Actually, yes, that would work, but the perps would go to jail. Once there's a slight chance of getting away with it, expect to see it happen across the country. See you in hell!
lol what a shit post, keep trying hard shill. maybe you will be a woman some day
Spoiler: he definitely won't.
PROJECTION AT ITS FINEST.