Dan Bongino recently said that he feels Barr did not go after the CIA, because they were involved over in the United Kingdom and it would make the CIA and USA look bad in many ways to go after our own bad actors in our agencies that did things outside our country.
This is obviously 4d chess, they are making it look like Durham is another swamp creature so he can infiltrate and get more damning evidence../s
We will have to do this ourselves the swamp has been there for over 100 years and have been indoctrinating people in schools and institutions for at least half that long were not going to vote that out in 4 years.
I never did. Sessions lost me after he recused. Barr’s swampy history has him lost to me before he was swan in. Wray had me optimistic until I saw he was overwhelmingly confirmed by the senate.
Durham looks all serious in that photo they always use..image over substance sadly.. unless he surprises us I think he's like that guy in Utah also investigating from his office and has never looked at anything...
So...let's use your measuring stick as a guide to inform our beliefs...the lack of action is not proof of anything.
So that means that Barr is not a swamp creature, that the FBI is not a swamp infested lagoon, that Wray is not a swamp creature, that the GOP is not a swampfest, and that SCOTUS is not a swampfest.
"I just did." <--- This irrational ploy is called argument from incredulity. That's two, now:
-Argument from ignorance (absence of evidence is evidence)
-Argument from incredulity.
Not so rational. Not so "great".
"So that means that Barr is not a swamp creature," Our suspicions about what happens behind closed doors has absolutely no rational connection to what really happens behind closed doors. You're told what you need to hear, because you have no "need to know". If either of us had that kind of clearance, we wouldn't be discussing it here. No one important who might be in this forum provides information without authorization, unless they're breaking the law. The public (especially the VOTING public) is told what they need to be told and that's not necessarily the straight story. Anything else is coming from your collective imagination.
lol You have no evidence. You have only a shiny two-day-old account. These discussions of "evidence" in internet forums are just fucking silly. You have no evidence. You will never have evidence. If you had evidence, you would be unable to present that evidence in a meaningful way. If you somehow managed to present alleged "evidence" in a meaningful way, you would only be presenting that evidence to a powerless court of public opinion that makes no fucking difference at all.
I am start to think this Durham character is made up.
Dan Bongino recently said that he feels Barr did not go after the CIA, because they were involved over in the United Kingdom and it would make the CIA and USA look bad in many ways to go after our own bad actors in our agencies that did things outside our country.
So it sounds like Durham is focusing on the FBI
Christ is the only savior.
This is obviously 4d chess, they are making it look like Durham is another swamp creature so he can infiltrate and get more damning evidence../s
We will have to do this ourselves the swamp has been there for over 100 years and have been indoctrinating people in schools and institutions for at least half that long were not going to vote that out in 4 years.
Two more weeks!
Wait, I was supposed to be hanging all my hopes on Durrham?
Why?
I never did. Sessions lost me after he recused. Barr’s swampy history has him lost to me before he was swan in. Wray had me optimistic until I saw he was overwhelmingly confirmed by the senate.
yup. Durham was probably eating steak dinners at epstein Island with his buddy Robert mueller
Remember when Barr told us last year that the investigation would be finished sometime in spring? He must have meant spring 2021.
(Cue deflating-bagpipe wheeze.)
Oh, don't worry; I'm sure the investigation was finished by then.
GEOTUS isn't doing a very good job of trusting the Plan. He must be a Democrat shill trying to divide the base.
Durham is working.
Trump distances himself from Durham.
He can't look partial.
Please stop being so gay.
:) Enjoy!
You're definitely not a shill. Go fuck yourself lol
Durham looks all serious in that photo they always use..image over substance sadly.. unless he surprises us I think he's like that guy in Utah also investigating from his office and has never looked at anything...
Nobody in America is shocked to find out he's a swamp creature. Where are you from?
"he's a swamp creature." Prove it.
"Can we prove he even exists?" Here in an internet forum??? Of course not. Don't be silly.
Omg didn’t you see, absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence 🙄
Sure, the evidence lies in the fact that you can't point to one thing he's done to fight the swamp.
"the fact that you can't point" Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence. You made a claim: PROVE YOUR CLAIM, shill.
No, it's really not.
I just did.
So...let's use your measuring stick as a guide to inform our beliefs...the lack of action is not proof of anything.
So that means that Barr is not a swamp creature, that the FBI is not a swamp infested lagoon, that Wray is not a swamp creature, that the GOP is not a swampfest, and that SCOTUS is not a swampfest.
I'm far more believable than you are.
"I just did." <--- This irrational ploy is called argument from incredulity. That's two, now:
-Argument from ignorance (absence of evidence is evidence)
-Argument from incredulity.
Not so rational. Not so "great".
"So that means that Barr is not a swamp creature," Our suspicions about what happens behind closed doors has absolutely no rational connection to what really happens behind closed doors. You're told what you need to hear, because you have no "need to know". If either of us had that kind of clearance, we wouldn't be discussing it here. No one important who might be in this forum provides information without authorization, unless they're breaking the law. The public (especially the VOTING public) is told what they need to be told and that's not necessarily the straight story. Anything else is coming from your collective imagination.
Rational in a way some people may not like, but absolutely true.
It’s hard to stop suspicions from feeling like facts and building an argument for there.
But no matter how you try to play it, false premises plus perfect reasoning produce false conclusions! ⚖️
Evidence unevenly applied isn't evidence. It's just simply emotional pablum.
It either applies to all or none...simple science.
lol You have no evidence. You have only a shiny two-day-old account. These discussions of "evidence" in internet forums are just fucking silly. You have no evidence. You will never have evidence. If you had evidence, you would be unable to present that evidence in a meaningful way. If you somehow managed to present alleged "evidence" in a meaningful way, you would only be presenting that evidence to a powerless court of public opinion that makes no fucking difference at all.
"Simple" observation.
this is worrying
If your a Q tard. Yes
Get in the train! You have to trust the plan!