lol You have no evidence. You have only a shiny two-day-old account. These discussions of "evidence" in internet forums are just fucking silly. You have no evidence. You will never have evidence. If you had evidence, you would be unable to present that evidence in a meaningful way. If you somehow managed to present alleged "evidence" in a meaningful way, you would only be presenting that evidence to a powerless court of public opinion that makes no fucking difference at all.
In other words, I want to apply my measuring stick to only this one situation and this situation only, and I'm going to cry and have a hissy fit if you try to apply my measuring stick to any other situation, well, just because I'm an emotional wreck and can't handle logic.
Comey said the same thing about Hillary: There's no evidence of intent of malevolence, so we can't charge her.
"In other words, I want to apply my measuring stick..." ¯|(ツ)/¯ Be aware of the value of your deductions (or any person's deductions) about things that occur above our pay-grade: it's zero.
So now that you want to triple down on dumb, let's go at it another way.
Is this a true statement or not?
"Ye shall know them by their fruits."
I'll be amused to see how you wiggle your way out of that one. I'll predict here and now that you'll just not answer it at all. It's small wonder that our government is morally bankrupt. They're just a reflection of the moral bankruptcy of the people.
Evidence unevenly applied isn't evidence. It's just simply emotional pablum.
It either applies to all or none...simple science.
lol You have no evidence. You have only a shiny two-day-old account. These discussions of "evidence" in internet forums are just fucking silly. You have no evidence. You will never have evidence. If you had evidence, you would be unable to present that evidence in a meaningful way. If you somehow managed to present alleged "evidence" in a meaningful way, you would only be presenting that evidence to a powerless court of public opinion that makes no fucking difference at all.
"Simple" observation.
In other words, I want to apply my measuring stick to only this one situation and this situation only, and I'm going to cry and have a hissy fit if you try to apply my measuring stick to any other situation, well, just because I'm an emotional wreck and can't handle logic.
Comey said the same thing about Hillary: There's no evidence of intent of malevolence, so we can't charge her.
Sounds like you'd agree with him.
"In other words, I want to apply my measuring stick..." ¯|(ツ)/¯ Be aware of the value of your deductions (or any person's deductions) about things that occur above our pay-grade: it's zero.
So now that you want to triple down on dumb, let's go at it another way.
Is this a true statement or not?
"Ye shall know them by their fruits."
I'll be amused to see how you wiggle your way out of that one. I'll predict here and now that you'll just not answer it at all. It's small wonder that our government is morally bankrupt. They're just a reflection of the moral bankruptcy of the people.
You do know you have the emotional maturity of a child, right?
You do know there are only two genders, right?
Very good. See, you're not complete devoid of learning facts after all. There's still hope for you.