Objective – A concise point-by-point breakdown of why we cannot allow this election to be compromised. This may be useful or educational to normies or lurkers here, or useful as cliff-notes to the seasoned pedes.
Central points
Democracy – People should have the right to select their leaders, otherwise they are subjects (consent of the governed, taxation/representation, et cetera)
•It is worth fighting for. It is worth dying for.
•There is no such thing as, “We’ll get ‘em next time!”. If they rigged this election, that will be the status quo moving forward. Democracy will cease to exist.
Biden Policies – The reduction of America to a de facto slave-nation serving the global oligopoly. America is a pot of gold and thorn in the side of the global ruling elite. At present, we require their competition to receive our resources (our money, work-hours, markets, et cetera). It is in their interest to secure our resources not through competition, but rather through the compulsory measures of the state.
•Excessive Taxation – Biden has declared his intention to implement excessive taxation under the guise of ending poverty. Drawing from previous examples, such as Obamacare as implemented by the Obama-Biden administration, this will involve the plunder of the American middle-class, with very little of these resources actually making it to the American public. That is, the administration will tax middle-America $20, and pass $1 to those in poverty, while channeling the remaining $19 to party-allies, political interest groups, and the controlling class, including foreign nations.
oSidenote: Even if all $20 were channeled back to the American public, the plunder of the middle-class would still be unethical and unpalatable. To quote the detested former AG Barr, “They would use the power of the state to remake man in their own image”.
•Gun control – The planned mass subjugation of the American public will be a faceted campaign of information, education, regulation of thought, etc. However, they will require a contingency that when all of these aforementioned efforts fail, the ruled class should not possess the means to usurp the ruling class. The elimination of private gun ownership is their unapologetically stated objective.
oSidenote: AR15s account for less than 1% of gun crime, yet are the primary target of gun control measures, why? These are the firearms that will most effectively counter the power of the state. Conveniently, they most often fire a 5.56x45 mm NATO cartridge, so it would be nearly impossible to squash out private firepower through regulation of munitions.
oOf course it won’t stop with AR15s (great speech by Nick Freitas on this https://www.bitchute.com/video/sZOd9vKMAv12/ [support this guy!]).
•Mass immigration – Sweeping measures are only accepted by a population faced with sweeping problems. Mass immigration is a powerful method of overwhelming an economy, while also introducing other issues (crime, terrorism, et cetera). The state then imposes authoritarian measures, such as curfews, gun control, knife control, and so on to address this manufactured crisis. This has already been successfully implemented in many European nations.
oSidenote: Global poverty cannot be solved by mass immigration (Gumball Immigration (bitchute.com)).
oSidenote: When terrorism supply does not meet terrorism demand, expect your three-letter agencies to fill the gap.
•Racial division – A unified population is dangerous to the ruling class. It is far easier to blame someone or something else for our shortcomings than it is to accept responsibility for them. Their objective is to convince “impoverished” peoples that their status is not the fault of their own, but rather the fault of the “privileged” peoples. Mere inspection of the “impoverished” versus “privileged” classes will show that if anything, the “impoverished” classes are often afforded many measures beyond those of the “privileged” class. This is a clear strategy to breed dissent in the general population.
oSidenote: All of this “riggers get the rope”, and “joggers”, and so on, is less than useless. Okay, it’s edgy, it’s meant in jest, it’s a tongue-in-cheek refutation to the insane politically correct culture being pushed by the left. While all true, it is also directly breeding division. The same may be said for all of the talk about “the Jews”. No one is refuting that crime is disproportionally concentrated in the black community, or that the Jewish population holds a disproportionately large degree of influence, but these are ancillary to our objective. Do not lose perspective. Our goal the creation of a free state for men of all classes and races. MAGA knows no racial, ethnic, or socio-economic boundaries.
•Censorship – The aforementioned policies may only be enacted with either support from the population (noting that it does not have to be a majority support, a minority support would suffice), or with the illusion of support from the population. Under the Obama-Biden administration we were told asinine statistics such as “9 out of 10 Americans support [sweeping gun control measures]”. The illusion of support for these policies may only be sustained in a closed-circuit economy of information. All information from television, news articles, and the internet will be carefully curated, controlled, and regulated to manufacture public opinion and the illusion of public opinion. We see this already on social media, but increased regulation is the next step.
oSidenote: There is a great documentary of how this was achieved in the pre-internet era, by none other than the great Communist, Noam Chomsky, titled “Manufacturing Consent”. As a far-left source, it is immune to the claims of being a “Far-right conspiracy”, and may serve as an excellent red pill. https://www.amazon.com/Manufacturing-Consent-Noam-Chomsky-Media/dp/B0031DDI4I
I have grossly failed in achieving the “concise” portion. I suppose staying sharp on these topics does require some degree of effort on our behalf. Stay sharp. Stay informed. Stay high energy. Keep the course, and be prepared.
Thanks for the feedback. I've tried to improve the formatting a bit. Sufficient?
I sincerely appreciate the feedback, and hope this will stimulate functional discussion!
Right now we don't need to fight for it physically because Trump is in a position to put a stop to their plans for another few weeks. However if Trump isn't able to do it via his authority and legal options then yes it becomes a situation where we either step up and end it ourselves or we become subject to what you described.
U nailed it its now or never. The only positive I can think of is if biden does get in we can go back to normal an they go back to slowly stripping are rights an laundering are money to other countries if you can call that a positive
Damn right people don't even know or care its sad. I told someone I was going to DC on the 6th an they was like for what you guys aint going to change anything