1224
Comments (112)
sorted by:
101
Junosu 101 points ago +101 / -0

With the cracker-jack FBi squad on it, we should know something in 60-73 years.

51
deleted 51 points ago +51 / -0
23
ChuckedBeef 23 points ago +23 / -0

They destroyed some evidence and this was the cover story.

17
jpower 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yup and they'll be announcing individuals soon I heard. You'll hear about a local KKK group being "responsible"

3
ColonelCottonHill 3 points ago +3 / -0

They just announced a 63yr old man as a person of interest because they have reports he owned a similar RV.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
Apply1776to1984 11 points ago +11 / -0

it’s a Deep State op.

Agreed, it reeks of glowies.

61
deleted 61 points ago +61 / -0
21
Susurro 21 points ago +22 / -1
14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
TruthWillOut 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. I believe this is the debris from one of the buildings in the video where you can see parts crashing down onto the street after the explosion.

These are the lower buildings opposite the red AT&T building.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
BlinkinSun 1 point ago +2 / -1

When you watch that video frame by frame, you can see the point source of the light to the left of the RV and the RV still standing. The ground and walls of the building to the left of the RV were completely blown apart. What you’re seeing to the right is the fuel source finding available oxygen and burning up after the initial blast.

5
stonepony 5 points ago +6 / -1

It was probably perpetrated by the same random cops and firefighters who blew up WT7 to frame the Religion Of Peace so Bush could steal that oil that we never got to steal. Or whatever.

2
SirReginald 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's too bad the tree couldn't run away.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
14
ShampocalypseWOW 14 points ago +14 / -0

If the RV was sitting right outside a building where a bomb that powerful went off then it wouldn't be surprising to see it blown to bits. They aren't really that sturdy.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
SirReginald 1 point ago +1 / -0

The VIN number would be nice to find.

3
IllKissYourBoobies 3 points ago +3 / -0

'VIN number' is redundant, just like 'ATM Machine'

2
becky21k1 2 points ago +3 / -1

The primary tag would have been on the cowl under the windshield but most vehicles have it stamped in a few other hidden places, a stamp on the frame may still be intact somewhere.

But it's easy to buy something that's sat a while not even registered and slap a plate on and go, too, it might not come back to anything useful

1
SirReginald 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure it's scrubbed clean but still a good place to start the CSI.

19
TheDonWon 19 points ago +19 / -0

I see no evidence of rubble or debris. These are baseless claims of an explosion. The building died from covid.

10
cgiles98 10 points ago +10 / -0

the building died from covid.

Kek

2
Shreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. If there was even a trace of China Virus in the building, that's a positive test and therefore the cause of demolition must be officially recorded as COVID-1984.

11
JoinTheDiscussion 11 points ago +11 / -0

Except when you remove the basement service hatch on the sidewalk and park the bomb right over the top!

11
eagle123 11 points ago +12 / -1

It was a missile.

6
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think so as well.

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +5 / -4

Show me the crater.

6
17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
2
TwoStar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that is the most likely explanation.

1
adigregorio 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it is the video I saw, slow it to 0.25 and you'll see it goes down not up.

Even how the trail dissipates matches more for a downward plume...

(This was the video: https://thedonald.win/p/11RNonqhCp/sooooo-it-wasnt-an-rv-was-it-dew/ )

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +11 / -10

Natural News? Pass. I don't find that site to be credible, they post a lot of bullshit like this.

3
eagle123 3 points ago +5 / -2

Nope. Watch the video closely. There is a trail in the sky leading to the ground shortly before the explosion.

-8
FireannDireach -8 points ago +6 / -14

Not gonna bother. Again, I've seen that site post nothing but pure horseshit for a while now. Show me a more credible source.

9
eagle123 9 points ago +12 / -3

The website didn't film or produce that video, moron. It only shared it. You have no valid comment.

-10
FireannDireach -10 points ago +5 / -15

Ah, insults. We're done here.

1
TheFountainhead 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pedes have pointed out the smoke trail start at ground going up. Likely debris outpacing the fireball.

1
PatriotMan1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

bro why does that look like a handsketch lmao

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
4d714n 6 points ago +6 / -0

There could have been two explosions. One from the RV and one inside the building. Some people are saying that there was an explosion hazard sign on the building. It's possible that the RV explosion caused an explosion inside the building which could have been much stronger than the RV one.

2
TwoStar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would not have been simultaneous. The videos would show two explosions, even if only a small separation in time.

2
Legalese 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a second explosion audible at 18 seconds when the person filming says, "Oh, shit!"

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1342470168585367552/pu/vid/592x1280/JCnVP0xlP9EJdyeL.mp4

1
TwoStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't know that, thank you. That sounds like what they call a "secondary" meaning it was an explosion caused by the damage from the first explosion. It doesn't sound like a large one to me.

I was going to say "well, they will put all these details together and the facts will come out" but then I remembered Las Vegas. We probably won't learn anything form the authorities. And there aren't any more "journalists."

1
TheRedRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s a tire on a vehicle popping.

2
Legalese 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could be, but it sounds pretty loud to be just a tire.

2
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a warning that things inside were hazardous and not to use water to fight any fires that come from it. I saw that too.

1
Polks_Corps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that the halon system in the data center?

2
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not very up to date on my hazardous materials symbols. Hopefully someone will know.

1
Constitution_jd 1 point ago +1 / -0

This seems to be the most likely outcome - which means that it was highly targeted and well-informed.

5
Belleoffreedom 5 points ago +7 / -2

Dunno. This is speculation. Speculation can eventually lead to information.

I remember reading a lot of crap about how the Twin Towers could not have collapsed inward, like they were designed to do.

4
BigFreedomBoner 4 points ago +4 / -0

We know one thing for sure. The FBI is CIA is DOJ is CCP.

4
MrSkyhawkPoopPans 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm sure it's one or multiple of these items.

  1. they are trying to destroy evidence and using the bomb as a cover-up.
  2. they are going to blame it on MAGA and try and stop us on 1/6.
3
K-Harbour 3 points ago +3 / -0

The evacuate now warning sounded more like a chemical plant automatic alarm. Maybe a gas manifold leaked and ultimately blew. This would explain the 50 mile spread of the sound waves through the gas pipelines.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
populist_nationalist 3 points ago +3 / -0

No fly zone now so nobody can take pictures

1
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

But not national security issues or anything. We pinky swears is.

3
GoingCamaro 3 points ago +3 / -0

But they found the registration and title unscathed matching it to a Jon Hillbilly, registered Republican who voted for Trump and is outspoken MAGA.

3
johndude 3 points ago +4 / -1

RV is the new 747

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
kcfreels 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, the facia of brick and steel fell off the original building there. Been inside the building in question in the past. The front is completely fake, and just tacked onto the building. It fell into the street when the blast shattered it. Couldn't go backwards, as the rest of the building is there. That said, this is a CIA attack on a NSA data collection location.

2
TraitorJoes 2 points ago +7 / -5

When the facade of a building is structurally compromised it is not unusual for the building to fall outwards as far as it is tall. For example, a 6 story building that is 12 feet floor to floor will fall outwards as far as 72 feet. I think this is what we are seeing here.

This is why in modern buildings that fire lanes are placed away from the buildings as above.

10
Dereliction 10 points ago +11 / -1

And how do you explain the trees?

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
3
Zskills 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you took out someone's legs, their legs would go the way of the impact but their head would fall the other way.

I don't see anything suspicious about the way the trees fell. Especially when you consider that the lowermost portion of the tree is closer to the building than the stump. Per my leg sweep example.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
geocitiesuser 1 point ago +2 / -1

Things don't always traject the way you expect them. It's very possible that the force of the explosion propelled the RV towards the other side of the road (explaining the video of it being across the street), and it's very possible that at the angle that tree was blasted, it was blocked by a standing tree and ultimately came to fall in the position it is now.

3
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would make sense if it was the FACADE that fell outwards. But the metal structural members? No, that is not how it works.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
NoSoMo_ThanU 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue here is that it doesn't seem to be that big of an explosion. The debris fell after the explosion, not sure if the guy knew what he was doing or not, but this thing had too much fireball and not enough force. If I had to put money on it, I'd say he obtained ammonium nitrate that had absorbed too much water and likely used too much diesel. He could have easily packed 1 ton into that RV and it would have taken out most of the block.

After thinking about it, he could have just used the RV as the device, using propane or another gas and an oxygen bottle and turned its internal volume into the bomb itself. It was fuel rich so perhaps oxygen wasn't used at all. On a scale of 1-10 with 1 being weak, this is about a 2. F for effort and effect.

Now if there's "RV" backlash over this, keep in mind that you could turn the average truck bed with cover on it into a far more powerful device than this and nobody would be the wiser. This was a really really weak device -- there'd be a crater if it was even worth mentioning given the size of the vehicle used.

The average medium car trunk has more than enough volume in it to make something that does MUCH more damage.

2
ultraman 2 points ago +2 / -0

now it looks like gretchen whitmor'es detroit.

2
IceCreamMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shots from a helicopter show the damage to the AT&T building, it blew a hole in the wall, sidewalk hatches and other damages going up the side of the building. The building that's in this picture facade collapsed and was over 100 years old. The tree was pushed over by the collapse. If you take a look at google streets, you can see the tree, building and the ATT building where a Ford Ranger is parked is the spot the RV was in.

2
Michonne21 2 points ago +2 / -0

The FBI is still investigating Jusse Smollet bleach noose attack and Bubbas garage handle but this one will be easy to solve because they can just ask John Brennan.

1
Kholland65 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m from this area, this photo is from the other side of the road from the ATT building. This ATT building is off camera to the right.

1
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK, I am persuadable. I was hoping for better images. Just certain the explosion did not come from the RV at this point.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CrackerSmurf2 1 point ago +1 / -0

The RV was the warning voice you heard to clear the area. The RV is probably on camera a block past when the bomb explodes. I don't see any RV body parts anywhere.

1
Trumpy_Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, a bomb is perfectly capable of blasting all the connections that hold the face of the building so that they fall apart and the face of the building falls off onto the street

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Weallseethetruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is video in Instagram that shows some kind of missile smoke trail... And then there's a video on the street showing the RV is NOT what blows up!! It looks like the street itself just blew up.... I'm not sure how to find these videos I don't go in Instagram someone showed me... But someone in here should find and post those videos!!

1
MoreAmericanThanMost 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like explosion may have come up out of the elevator shafts that were on the sidewalk

1
Dessert4TWO69 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Definitely inside something then.

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is what happens.

There are two parts to an explosion. First, the outward force as the explosion expands, pushing everything out of its way; second the inward force as stuff rushes inward to fill the vacuum created by the explosion.

1
BigIslandFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn it pede.

Don't go confusing the NARRATIVE with FACTS.

It was RUSSIA.

And the Proud Boys.

1
RedFoxOnFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Suicide bomber on Christmas Day.

Personally, my first thought goes to "Aloha Snackbar", or maybe Admiral Ackbar..

1
poconopede 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what I've been saying!

1
Centipedealicious 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice catch!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RikyStew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Matches the OKC bombing. Must be a white-nationalist.

1
TrumpTrainRollin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just in, the computers and network routers inside the data center overloaded and spontaneously exploded from all the pent up Patriot rage flooding the interzones with actual fraud data and deep state corruption evidence.

1
BunnyPicnic 1 point ago +2 / -1

If the truck was parked on the street, why aren't the trees bent over away from the blast?

2
VonBustacap 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the force was close to the ground, it would have cut through the bottom, pushing the bottom away and the top towards the blast. That's consistent with what's seen in the photo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WhiskeyRebellion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also why didn't the cardboard boxes burn more, how did icicles form so quickly, JFK's head goes back and to the left, and Larry Silverstein ordered Building 7 destroyed which contained GWB's ANG service records.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
kek_saved_the_world 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that a lady walking her dog in the shot after cooking dinner?

<No, it's the professional>

OMG we are doomed

1
Michonne21 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or a Deep state CIA/FBI/DOJ looking for human body parts to cook for dinner. They are all cannibals.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
becky21k1 0 points ago +1 / -1

I thought that tangle on the left is what's left of the RV? Maybe not. There should be the frame, axles, engine/trans and cab somewhere, perhaps mangled up. The rest is consumable, wood, fiberglass and stuff.

0
pokeman 0 points ago +1 / -1

Probably a dumb antifa cuck who got bomb assembly instructions from the fine folks at 4chan