posted ago by MadisonCandle ago by MadisonCandle +6 / -3

i’m honestly ok bringing in legitimate refugees in any number as long as two conditions are met.

  1. we eliminate all election/voter fraud vulnerabilities and compromises, including autist-friendly livestreams of the chain of custody and counting.

  2. we only accept freedom loving refugees from communist/socialist shitholes, or christian refugees from basically any country they’re persecuted in.

it’d be a real shame if this resulted in the unintended consequence of making it very hard for america–hating democrats to ever win any future elections, but that’s a price i’m willing to pay to help these refugees.

no religion is more persecuted than christians, and no population has been more tyrannized than those living under marxist regimes.

does that still seem like it’s not doing enough to help refugees? do the democrats assure us there are other persecuted people that need to come and that racism is the real problem?

well, i heard rumors that some farmers are being murdered for their skin color in africa. maybe we could look into that too.

edited to add: i figured out how to add the “shitpost” tag—crisis averted

Comments (10)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
ChadRight92 5 points ago +5 / -0

We should take in white South Africans. The rest i don't care, there's plenty of other countries that can help the muslim refugees or Somalis or whatever. So-called "refugees" have committed terrorist attacks all across europe and some in America too. They're not even real refugees.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0