I did forward-facing systems security connecting to disparate systems with varying degrees of egress (DMV, Law Enforcement, Judicial) for 21 years and any script kiddie could have gained access to a Dominion server.
Comments (176)
sorted by:
I did forward-facing systems security connecting to disparate systems with varying degrees of egress (DMV, Law Enforcement, Judicial) for 21 years and any script kiddie could have gained access to a Dominion server.
They don't need to prove it happened (which they have with traffic of machines connecting to net). If you can prove the votes can be tampered with in a way that leaves no trace then the machines are no good ergo election is thrown out.
Uh you need to provide evidence something happened to get a judge to take the case. This document doesn't do that. It says things could have happened without any evidence saying it probably did. This will be rejected by any court it's submitted to. Do you want to make a bet? Rudy and Trump have an easily provably true case. These pages don't make her case look likely to succeed because it's mostly hypotheticals. You won't find too many a high level judge willing to touch this trash.
Right. You provide evidence that the voting machines didn't meet the requirements set forth by each state (for example, they're required to have an error a fraction of a percent, but they had nearly 70% error in two dominion audits) which would cast doubt on the results of the election, either forcing a signature audit (time is running out) or forcing electors to be selected for Trump (since there is a deadline of Jan 6th). Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh