I did forward-facing systems security connecting to disparate systems with varying degrees of egress (DMV, Law Enforcement, Judicial) for 21 years and any script kiddie could have gained access to a Dominion server.
Comments (176)
sorted by:
I did forward-facing systems security connecting to disparate systems with varying degrees of egress (DMV, Law Enforcement, Judicial) for 21 years and any script kiddie could have gained access to a Dominion server.
Since all the contested states have paper ballot backups, there is literally a trace. No election will be thrown out unless a hand recount proves the tampering. At that point you'd need to prove the paper ballots were also tampered with.
Also they have no traffic of machines connecting to the net. I don't see that anywhere in this document.
Then it would force a signature audit. Col. Waldren provided that information in sworn testimony.
What do signatures have to do with foreign actors hacking voting machines to manipulate the results?
Because the machines require a standard to be met to be eligible to be voting machines. By demonstrating multiple vectors of attack, they've demonstrated the machines are not eligible for the election. They would either a) throw the election out and give electors to Trump or b) do a signature and voting machine audit to verify the results from the error prone machines. In Michigan for example the machines are required to have an error rate below a fraction of a percent, when an audit was done they found an error rate of 68%. The machines were not supposed to connect to the net, and Col. Waldren provided sworn testimony they did, as well as several others stating they were able to remotely control the machines. This is enough proof. You don't need to even have video evidence (which we do). You just need to prove the machines were set up in a way that could allow them to be easily hacked and hard to detect.