That was a post saying that Dominion didn’t have a direct relation to the AT&T building at 185 2nd Ave, which was the claim made by many. They talked about Cerberus Capital owning the ATT building, but did not mention it was 333 Commerce Street, and not 185 2nd Ave. Today I uncovered that not only did Dominion have ties to the 333 Commerce Street building through its previous owners, they now directly have a tie with 185 2nd Street via William Kennard, an exec at ATT which owns Bellsouth who own 185 2nd Ave, as well as being on the board of Dominion.
There ended up being a different link to Dominion, but not one several people were propagating.
Saddly i have to keep posting this. No dominion has no relation to att. https://thedonald.win/p/11RNonqy3U/fake-news--att-building-owned-by/
That’s my own post brother. This is an update.
That was a post saying that Dominion didn’t have a direct relation to the AT&T building at 185 2nd Ave, which was the claim made by many. They talked about Cerberus Capital owning the ATT building, but did not mention it was 333 Commerce Street, and not 185 2nd Ave. Today I uncovered that not only did Dominion have ties to the 333 Commerce Street building through its previous owners, they now directly have a tie with 185 2nd Street via William Kennard, an exec at ATT which owns Bellsouth who own 185 2nd Ave, as well as being on the board of Dominion.
There ended up being a different link to Dominion, but not one several people were propagating.