I am seeing a lot of optimism about Jan 6th, and I don't want to burst any bubbles, but I'd like to point out the reality of the situation.

Step 1 is getting a Senator and a House Rep to object to a state's electoral votes. This will likely happen.

Step 2 happens after the objections. The House and Senate separate, and debate for 2 hours. Next, they vote. Here is the key that I think a lot of people are missing. We need a simple majority in order to sustain the objections. Since we do not have a Republican majority in the House, I don't see how this can happen. In fact, Sellout Mitch has already signaled he doesn't want the GOP objecting to the electors, so I doubt we even win in the Senate.

Step 3 is self-explanatory—we are fucked.

Summary: "The joint session does not act on any objections that are made. Instead, the joint session is suspended, the Senate withdraws from the House chamber, andeach house meets separately to debate the objection and vote whether, based on the objection, to count the vote or votes in question. Both houses must vote separately to agree to the objectionby simple majority. Otherwise, the objection fails and the vote or votes are counted. (3 U.S.C. §15 provides that “the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes.”)

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32717.pdf

All these Congressman who are saying they will object are just virtue signaling. They know the outcome (as explained above), but they think this will make them look good.

Finally, the miracle scenario is a contigent election. It seems that everyone thinks this is what will happen on Jan. 6th. However, as explained above, this is extremely unlikely. IF both chambers sustained the objections, and no candidate got to 270, then the House would get to decide who is POTUS, and each state gets ONE vote.