"This is astounding 695,000 to 958,000 just got up and vanished out of PA. President Trump, I have a breakdown by Last Name of all of the people that have been gone missing."
The headcount of people who disappeared after supposedly voting. This proves outright fraud if the residents never existed yet their votes were counted.
True but hey everyone we get to see the light is one less we have to fight. People can be very apolitical, if I show this to the fence dwellers who aren't passionate one way or another this stuff can easily sway them . Its easy to understand, they don't have to engage much brain power and its irrefutable. So God bless Bobby Piton and Matt Braynard who are amassing a ton of this easily digestable data.
I can't imagine how you could suggest confederates are democrats.these labels are far from what they where then but please explain.in my history the union where the commie fuckers that renigged on states rights and imposed radical taxation and central banking.the spirit of the american revolution was fight in 1860 during the civil war.sadly we lost and we are where we are now.that was was not about slavery it was about freedom.
The US Civil War was about Successionists trying to leave the US; and the Election of Republican Abraham Lincoln was the "he's NOT my President" which in itself wasn't the "crossing the Rubicon". The Rubicon was crossed when "Fort Sumpter" was attacked, thus officially kicking off "the Southern Rebellion" which most "everyone" thought/said it would be quick (Historical Hint: wars are never quick, not even X day wars, because they don't really make a 'peace' it's more a succession of open hostilities.)
After the Battle of Gettysburg, and in the Gettysburg Address, the under issue of Slavery was also brought to the open the Secondary Top issue of the War.
Even though the Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, it didn't play much part in US Politics for a generation or more afterwards (it was busy spreading/being spread by the evil doers within Europe and onward.)
By the Time the Dems regained leadership and national politics within the USA post Civil War (1870s); this also co-incided with the arrival of marxist thinking, and mass exportation/importation of millions of more immigrants, particularly in places like NYC.
The "commie fuckers that renigged on States rights" who violate our Constitution, with things like "radical taxation and central banking" those came (mostly) into the Dem Party (mostly) from 1870 onward to today, no matter which State or where North or South of the Mason-Dixon LIne the Dems came/come from.
Plenty of northern yankees and southerners and western pioneers opposed Dem/Commie policies; it's one reason (including 2A) why the USA is the last place on earth the commies haven't openly run amuck. And the few times they did, like 1930's-WW2, the majority of the public was propagandized into supporting marxism in the name of "liberty" etc.
The issue of States' Rights is complex; but most of the destruction of States' Rights has been post Marxism's infestation of the Dem Party these last 120+ years.
The issue is the evil ideology which is marxism. Without marxism, most of the issues you mention would be removed. This isn't an issue about who won the US Civil War. The issue is about removing marxism from our shores; and stop feeding marxism and marxism's wars.
This is the part I still don't understand after reading other comments and the full twitter thread:
245,033 or just under 47% of the total Last Names in PA only belong to 1 and only 1 person!
Is he saying that 245k people have a unique last name that no other citizen in PA has? And that is weird because it means 47% of citizens have no family whatsoever?
Just trying to rephrase this so I can understand it....
Yes. There are apparently only 521,879 last names in PA. 245,033 of those last names each only have a single associated first name. No parents, no siblings, no children.
A couple hundred or so might be reasonable where some random people change their names legally to something strange. The rest of them will likely not exist anywhere else but on paper in order to 'vote' in 2020.
That's an utterly worthless statistic without a comparison to other states. It amounts to "I did some digging and the statistics I find don't match my pre conceived notions that were based on absolutely zero data"
47% of the name does not mean 47% of citizens. 245k/9million is only like 3% of citizens.
doesn't mean they have no family. only means that their family didn't vote. or, spouses don't always change names so families might not all have same name.
It’s not that 245k have the same name, it’s that 245k people have wholly unique names. Meaning no aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, moms, dads, grandparents have that same name. No one else in the state have the same name. Meaning they just fucking magically appeared to vote, dipshit.
They added fake names. They found this out because the people who "voted" have no relatives of any kind. They are literally ghosts as they have no records of any kind in PA besides voting in the 2020 election.
Yeah in the Twitter thread he goes on to say: "Once again, no brothers, sisters, aunts, cousins, parents that share this particular last name out of 9 Million records. Upon looking at the TOP 1000 Last Names in PA, I have discovered that PA has 695,430 Fewer People in the top 1000 Last Names. Literally, there are 14,776"
He's been doing a ton of research, not just on this topic, but a fair amount of economic research as well. In interviews he has made it clear he can unequivocally prove there is an organized effort (since at least the early 90s) to create fake people across the country. They shift these "phantom voters" around where they need them & they're using multiple ways to generate them so they make it onto the voter roles. He's convinced the US pop is much much lower than people think & can pretty much prove it at this point.
I hope he doesn't get real sad all of the sudden an fall off a bridge somewhere. It seems to happen to people that can prove the left is corrupt, not that we don't already know it. Just are able to prove it.
Yeah. Or shoot himself in the chest like the guy who created DHS & decided to off himself 2 weeks after giving an interview where he claimed Muslim Brotherhood had infiltrated the Office of the VP. That guy was real depressed.
I'm confused by this statement - DHS was create by W to expand government overreach after 9/11 and was headed by Tom Ridge. I'll always remember that disaster. I doubt Muslim Brotherhood infiltrated Dick Cheney so I'm guess you're talking about something else... Just confused by your statement but I get the idea so updoot...
Im with you. Ive read the thread 6 times and I still have no idea what this guy is on about. Starting with "I examined just over 9,008,753 records", records of what? then "245,033 or just under 47% of the total Last Names in PA only belong to 1 and only 1 person", 245,033 of the what total? the 9 million or the 521 thousand unique names? then theres "I have discovered that PA has 695,430 Fewer People in the top 1000 Last Names", how does he know how many people should be there with those last names? and the rest of it makes less sense since i have no idea what he's talking about. Unless I'm just retarded, this guy really needs to explain this better.
So he is saying that they skimmed off the top 10,000 names off each last name and replaced them with some randomly generated last name that is just a bunch of letter to create a fake identity?
Sorry, there will be no investigations. All resources and FBI personnel have been steered away from election fraud and are working the Nashville bombing.
Read the thread.
"This is astounding 695,000 to 958,000 just got up and vanished out of PA. President Trump, I have a breakdown by Last Name of all of the people that have been gone missing."
The headcount of people who disappeared after supposedly voting. This proves outright fraud if the residents never existed yet their votes were counted.
This is huge. Needs full exposure. Dude is a major Genius.
Right, its easily understandable information that even the densest bulb can see indicates fraud.
True but hey everyone we get to see the light is one less we have to fight. People can be very apolitical, if I show this to the fence dwellers who aren't passionate one way or another this stuff can easily sway them . Its easy to understand, they don't have to engage much brain power and its irrefutable. So God bless Bobby Piton and Matt Braynard who are amassing a ton of this easily digestable data.
Easily explainable. They all voted early and then climbed into trains, planes, and automobiles and moved to Michigan so they could vote there too.
Dang!... how many Somalis did they bring to Pennsylvanian on Election night? 😳
Holy hell so they threw out almost a million honest voters ballots and replaced them with phantom voters to mimic the voter population. Holy
Has this country been decisively red since Reagan and we didn't even know it? They've likely been programming us for decades.
yes. i think so.
I've been outside. This country is very red.
I thought the last time Republicans were blue and Democrats were red was during Bush/ Gore? The media swapped colors after that election.
The democrats should have stayed red.. like China. Too close to home?
I honestly think this is why they switched.
Correct. Red was the color of the Left since dirt, patriots were true blue.
Redpill:
The media "color swap" didn't occur until during these last 20 years of full marxist takeover of media; before that:
Republicans = Blue = Union.
Democrats = Red = Confederates/Commies.
We really need to switch the colors back VERY VERY REAL SOON, like on JAN 1st, 2021 it goes back to:
Republicans = Blue;
Democrats = Red.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_colour
I can't imagine how you could suggest confederates are democrats.these labels are far from what they where then but please explain.in my history the union where the commie fuckers that renigged on states rights and imposed radical taxation and central banking.the spirit of the american revolution was fight in 1860 during the civil war.sadly we lost and we are where we are now.that was was not about slavery it was about freedom.
The US Civil War was about Successionists trying to leave the US; and the Election of Republican Abraham Lincoln was the "he's NOT my President" which in itself wasn't the "crossing the Rubicon". The Rubicon was crossed when "Fort Sumpter" was attacked, thus officially kicking off "the Southern Rebellion" which most "everyone" thought/said it would be quick (Historical Hint: wars are never quick, not even X day wars, because they don't really make a 'peace' it's more a succession of open hostilities.)
After the Battle of Gettysburg, and in the Gettysburg Address, the under issue of Slavery was also brought to the open the Secondary Top issue of the War.
Even though the Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, it didn't play much part in US Politics for a generation or more afterwards (it was busy spreading/being spread by the evil doers within Europe and onward.)
By the Time the Dems regained leadership and national politics within the USA post Civil War (1870s); this also co-incided with the arrival of marxist thinking, and mass exportation/importation of millions of more immigrants, particularly in places like NYC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tammany_Hall
The "commie fuckers that renigged on States rights" who violate our Constitution, with things like "radical taxation and central banking" those came (mostly) into the Dem Party (mostly) from 1870 onward to today, no matter which State or where North or South of the Mason-Dixon LIne the Dems came/come from.
Plenty of northern yankees and southerners and western pioneers opposed Dem/Commie policies; it's one reason (including 2A) why the USA is the last place on earth the commies haven't openly run amuck. And the few times they did, like 1930's-WW2, the majority of the public was propagandized into supporting marxism in the name of "liberty" etc.
The issue of States' Rights is complex; but most of the destruction of States' Rights has been post Marxism's infestation of the Dem Party these last 120+ years.
The issue is the evil ideology which is marxism. Without marxism, most of the issues you mention would be removed. This isn't an issue about who won the US Civil War. The issue is about removing marxism from our shores; and stop feeding marxism and marxism's wars.
This will have no standing though. States are allowed to rEgIsTeR a SiNgLe vOtEr 250,000 TiMeS iF tHeY wAnT tO
Laches!
Well Cornpop is an usual name
CRAZY MOTHER FUCKER NAMED HOT TRIANGLE?
HERE COME OL "BOOM BOOM" CANNON
Not a great guy, either
I unnerstan he were a BAD dude.
Malarkey Caulkin.....!
This is the part I still don't understand after reading other comments and the full twitter thread:
Is he saying that 245k people have a unique last name that no other citizen in PA has? And that is weird because it means 47% of citizens have no family whatsoever?
Just trying to rephrase this so I can understand it....
Yes. He's saying 47% of the last names are unique to just one voter (i.e., no one else shares the last name)
Yes. There are apparently only 521,879 last names in PA. 245,033 of those last names each only have a single associated first name. No parents, no siblings, no children.
A couple hundred or so might be reasonable where some random people change their names legally to something strange. The rest of them will likely not exist anywhere else but on paper in order to 'vote' in 2020.
That's an utterly worthless statistic without a comparison to other states. It amounts to "I did some digging and the statistics I find don't match my pre conceived notions that were based on absolutely zero data"
no, you are wrong on 2 counts.
He’s saying in the real world,
Smith Jones Johnson Miller Anderson Patel Gomes Garcia
Make up like 15% of last names in the USA
In pa, the mail in voter names weren’t smith and Jones but were Acnklxtu Mdujoped Ffffussrfed Or other letter combinations that are not popular names
like Xi maybe?
That an interesting Amish name.
Wrong
It’s not that 245k have the same name, it’s that 245k people have wholly unique names. Meaning no aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, moms, dads, grandparents have that same name. No one else in the state have the same name. Meaning they just fucking magically appeared to vote, dipshit.
BuT hE cAlLeD yOu A bEtA cUcK
omg, not the beta cuck, that is sooooo harsh.
"I may eventually cuck, we'll see, this is just the beta"
Its magical alright. Magically delicious.
Then read the fucking title next time knucklehead.
is this the guy who talked about phone numbers, all tied to one name?
I think he's the water chugger from MI hearing
How about a sample list of names? Maybe 100? And set out to find these people to see if they voted?
This is the problem with our side. We half ass things. If you believe something is there, follow through.
You can literally feel his excitement and energy through the tweet! He was so awesome to watch at the Arizona hearing!
I'm a little confused on how this works, somebody help me.
They added fake names. They found this out because the people who "voted" have no relatives of any kind. They are literally ghosts as they have no records of any kind in PA besides voting in the 2020 election.
I dont get jt
Basically there are "people" who "voted" with no family of any kind. Like they were made out of thin air. No relatives at all.
Basically they used fake names to add in votes for Biden.
Yeah in the Twitter thread he goes on to say: "Once again, no brothers, sisters, aunts, cousins, parents that share this particular last name out of 9 Million records. Upon looking at the TOP 1000 Last Names in PA, I have discovered that PA has 695,430 Fewer People in the top 1000 Last Names. Literally, there are 14,776"
He's been doing a ton of research, not just on this topic, but a fair amount of economic research as well. In interviews he has made it clear he can unequivocally prove there is an organized effort (since at least the early 90s) to create fake people across the country. They shift these "phantom voters" around where they need them & they're using multiple ways to generate them so they make it onto the voter roles. He's convinced the US pop is much much lower than people think & can pretty much prove it at this point.
I hope he doesn't get real sad all of the sudden an fall off a bridge somewhere. It seems to happen to people that can prove the left is corrupt, not that we don't already know it. Just are able to prove it.
Yeah. Or shoot himself in the chest like the guy who created DHS & decided to off himself 2 weeks after giving an interview where he claimed Muslim Brotherhood had infiltrated the Office of the VP. That guy was real depressed.
I'm confused by this statement - DHS was create by W to expand government overreach after 9/11 and was headed by Tom Ridge. I'll always remember that disaster. I doubt Muslim Brotherhood infiltrated Dick Cheney so I'm guess you're talking about something else... Just confused by your statement but I get the idea so updoot...
Haney was the figure instrumental in creating DHS. He became a whistleblower.
He means this guy, Philip Haney
Interesting idea on how the polulation of the US may be alot less. I really find it hard to beleive that China and India have pops over 1 billion.
Trump won... by a lot!
A fuck-ton and then some!
Yuge if we get a comparison to a non shit hole state and it shows this is abnormal.
So, 9,008,754?
Damn, almost have a straight.
Huh?
Im with you. Ive read the thread 6 times and I still have no idea what this guy is on about. Starting with "I examined just over 9,008,753 records", records of what? then "245,033 or just under 47% of the total Last Names in PA only belong to 1 and only 1 person", 245,033 of the what total? the 9 million or the 521 thousand unique names? then theres "I have discovered that PA has 695,430 Fewer People in the top 1000 Last Names", how does he know how many people should be there with those last names? and the rest of it makes less sense since i have no idea what he's talking about. Unless I'm just retarded, this guy really needs to explain this better.
These last names must have been something....... Can't imagine that many unique last names.
So he is saying that they skimmed off the top 10,000 names off each last name and replaced them with some randomly generated last name that is just a bunch of letter to create a fake identity?
Sorry but I am not sure I understand.
Sorry, there will be no investigations. All resources and FBI personnel have been steered away from election fraud and are working the Nashville bombing.
And the rest are on standby, just in case any more garage door pulls are discovered.
Can we get his data to check it ourselves?
We don't need more evidence, we all know it was stolen. What we need is someone to act!
WOW !!!! I . LOVE . THIS . GUY !!!
He needs to clarify exactly what his research reveals. No one understands his words. Boil it down, Bobby. Keep it simple.
That one Person is Legion, for they are many.
Holy fuck. What the fuck.