Let's hope they have the balls to do their job this time, someone tie up Roberts and leave the votes to those who ACTUALLY HAVE A SPINE BETWEEN THEM. Be the Supreme Court this time not the SUPREME CUCKS. Thanks - Humanity
Frankly, the Texas thing was a bit of an out of left field thing. There was never any plan by the Trump team to hit SCOTUS that early or with something totally unprecedented. There are some smart people out there that believe SCOTUS nixed it because it would have messed things up and muddied the waters a bit.
Trump and his team, as having clear standing and a path to remedy, are the only people who should be bringing a case, so that it is a clean, clear situation that SCOTUS can rule on.
I'll reserve my judgement of SCOTUS until everything plays out, but so far, everything is on the original schedule so I see no reason for everyone freaking out right now.
If they don't take up the case, then they are completely compromised. I doubt they are. They can't use the "standing" excuse this time, and I still believe they used that to get the Texas thing to back off so they can focus on the real case brought by Trump, who has direct standing.
I'm sorry, as excited as we all were (including me), about the Texas case, it really did have the potential to cause problems for Trump. Even the lefties on the Court can handle multiple cases at once, but stuff like this needs to be isolated and nothing else diverting their attention. Too much is on the line. And frankly, the Texas case brought up a lot of unresolved questions dating back to 1861, basically how sovereign are the states, and when and if they can file a grievance with the Court.
And I think the judicial philosophy going forward has been "don't answer that question", because it could very well destroy the union for good. It's better to "pretend" there is an unbreakable bond, than to really dig at the heart of the question and answer it, because the Founders really didn't set that union in stone very well, probably for good reason.
Hell, the entire Civil War was constitutionally illegitimate. There's is nothing in it that says states can't just leave. That is the real reason they never tried Jefferson Davis for treason, because it would have forced the court to answer certain questions that might prove the Civil War was unjustified. And that has still not been remedied. And I don't know why.
But yeah, the court doesn't want to touch something like the Texas case, and I totally get why. I don't think it's right, but I get it.
Never thought I could dislike a current supreme court justice more than Kagan and Sotomayor. Betrayal by Roberts is the worst, I guess it started with b. Hussein o. Healthcare ruling.
Lin Wood
@LLinWood 17h
Patriots MUST read the thread that follows this 6/29/20 tweet in its ENTIRETY.
You will face some ugly truths about our country & its “leaders.” But we must face those truths if our country & our freedom are to survive.
Quote Tweet
[email protected] · Jun 29
Many people have asked, "what do they have on Chief Justice Roberts"? The time has come to answer that question.
I'm told the SCOTUS will be taking up some Second Amendment issues soon, issues with Far reaching implications for our Country, Roberts CANNOT be relied upon to
Show this threadttps://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1277704439550410754
[email protected] ·Jun 29
What I do have is the knowledge, the ability to prove, the whereabouts of physical evidence, and the people involved along with Roberts. In the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.
Not the Kelly case. Trump v PA Boockvar. Docketed on 12/23. Don’t see any further info about it re action before 1/6. But it’s challenging the lower court ruling from 10/23.
Let's hope they have the balls to do their job this time, someone tie up Roberts and leave the votes to those who ACTUALLY HAVE A SPINE BETWEEN THEM. Be the Supreme Court this time not the SUPREME CUCKS. Thanks - Humanity
Put a ball gag and butt plug in him and tie him to the bench
You don't have to ask Big Mike twice
Kek
Frankly, the Texas thing was a bit of an out of left field thing. There was never any plan by the Trump team to hit SCOTUS that early or with something totally unprecedented. There are some smart people out there that believe SCOTUS nixed it because it would have messed things up and muddied the waters a bit.
Trump and his team, as having clear standing and a path to remedy, are the only people who should be bringing a case, so that it is a clean, clear situation that SCOTUS can rule on.
I'll reserve my judgement of SCOTUS until everything plays out, but so far, everything is on the original schedule so I see no reason for everyone freaking out right now.
Fuck the SCOTUS and the three spineless losers Trump appointed to it. They are a lost cause.
I pray Pence won't lose his nerve like those pricks. We are running out of time and options.
If they don't take up the case, then they are completely compromised. I doubt they are. They can't use the "standing" excuse this time, and I still believe they used that to get the Texas thing to back off so they can focus on the real case brought by Trump, who has direct standing.
I'm sorry, as excited as we all were (including me), about the Texas case, it really did have the potential to cause problems for Trump. Even the lefties on the Court can handle multiple cases at once, but stuff like this needs to be isolated and nothing else diverting their attention. Too much is on the line. And frankly, the Texas case brought up a lot of unresolved questions dating back to 1861, basically how sovereign are the states, and when and if they can file a grievance with the Court.
And I think the judicial philosophy going forward has been "don't answer that question", because it could very well destroy the union for good. It's better to "pretend" there is an unbreakable bond, than to really dig at the heart of the question and answer it, because the Founders really didn't set that union in stone very well, probably for good reason.
Hell, the entire Civil War was constitutionally illegitimate. There's is nothing in it that says states can't just leave. That is the real reason they never tried Jefferson Davis for treason, because it would have forced the court to answer certain questions that might prove the Civil War was unjustified. And that has still not been remedied. And I don't know why.
But yeah, the court doesn't want to touch something like the Texas case, and I totally get why. I don't think it's right, but I get it.
No source....
Never thought I could dislike a current supreme court justice more than Kagan and Sotomayor. Betrayal by Roberts is the worst, I guess it started with b. Hussein o. Healthcare ruling.
There’s a lot of skepticism in the comments to the tweet. May be just bullshit
So they moved up the time? Trying to get in the way of our super-sized family Réunion.
Lin Wood @LLinWood 17h Patriots MUST read the thread that follows this 6/29/20 tweet in its ENTIRETY.
You will face some ugly truths about our country & its “leaders.” But we must face those truths if our country & our freedom are to survive.
Quote Tweet [email protected] · Jun 29 Many people have asked, "what do they have on Chief Justice Roberts"? The time has come to answer that question. I'm told the SCOTUS will be taking up some Second Amendment issues soon, issues with Far reaching implications for our Country, Roberts CANNOT be relied upon to Show this threadttps://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1277704439550410754
Easing tensions before Patriots show up on the 6th? Ain't gonna work
One of the comments says Jan 8
How about a link?
It'sthis case right
About the consitutionity of mail in ballots?
Kelly case
Not the Kelly case. Trump v PA Boockvar. Docketed on 12/23. Don’t see any further info about it re action before 1/6. But it’s challenging the lower court ruling from 10/23.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-845.html
Have a feeling they took it to shoot it down for headlines right before Jan 6. Is that too cynical?
When did OANN report it? Just now? It's not on their Twitter page.
Deja vu?
We will see if they dont try to slow walk it to past january and give biden enough time to stack the court
what the fuck are you even saying
It claims SCOTUS will hear the PA case. That wont make much difference if biden is in office, pulling the strings, now will it?
Words are hard...
Where's the sauce? ... And even then they'll look away just like the rest of the courts
thank God..