20
posted ago by Wreckastow ago by Wreckastow +22 / -2

The votes are called for each state individually.

If there is an objection to the validity of the votes of any state by a senator, then at least one congressmen from the House has to agree with (second) the objection.

The two sides will adjourn to debate/vote on the state at hand.

If EITHER HOUSE OR SENATE says those votes are legit, then they will be counted. (this is the problem, the dems own the house and will always say every states votes are legit)

Pence will say who has how many votes after all the counting is done and announce the winner.

THAT IS IT. I cannot find any actual constitutionally based rules or laws that have anything to do with counting the votes.

All the votes made it in by the safe harbor date, all this stuff about alternate electors is just BS. Only votes turned in by that date and certified are legit.

We need hard information and actual legal options if change is going to occur, not just more propaganda and praying about shit to happen.

At most, I can see Pence refusing to read out Bidens name, but that won't matter, Pelosi or Sanders will do it in his stead.

EDIT: We know for SURE that WIsconsin votes did not make it in by Safe Harbor day. That does not mean they will not be counted, but that is certainly grounds to contest them.

Comments (16)
sorted by:
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
wethepepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

What you say resonates with me quite a lot. Never knew the right way/word to describe it

6
Skipster777 6 points ago +6 / -0

And if any fraudulent Biden electors are read, we storm the building(s) and take our country back.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
Wreckastow [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wisconsin is the only state I can find for sure that has missed Safe Harbor day, still not sure those votes will be thrown out tho.

The constitution does NOT give Pence plenary power, the American Thinker is just making that up and that's a part of the problem.

If he ACTUALLY had plenary power, then he could throw out whatever he wants, but he cannot do that and all of this would be useless because we would all know the score and there would be nothing to worry about.

Trump could even say, no worries Pence has this, we win, he hasn't said it because its not true.

We need better answers than American Thinker and the fictional powers they are bestowing upon Pence. We need actual legal people, like constitutional lawyers to figure out this issue. People are giving us too much bad info.

4
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

well i'm sure not an expert on this but I think Jefferson decided which votes to count as VP and essentially made himself president that way.

we are in uncharted territory here to some extent as massive fraud was committed and the people won't stand for it. Not 100% sure this trap they set by trying to use our own constitution against us won't be the end of them instead.

We will all know soon.

2
SR91Aurora 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are all the senators and congressmen going to be in DC on January 6th?

2
mschopman 2 points ago +2 / -0

And then they ignore anything Pence says, and they will get away with it.

Legislation and judicial system has failed. Jenna basically layed out why martial law or insurrection act is out of the question, and she is right, and frankly I don’t see anyone from the military higher ups enforce anything Trump orders. They are just as corrupt. There is no one, besides his close confidents and lawyers supporting Trump. He has 80 million voters... but, so far not a single BLM, Portland like demonstration by angry disenfranchised voters, none.

You think the 6th will start shaking up the corrupted officials, wake up. More lawsuits? Nothing progressed since the 3th of November till today, nothing will change from now till the 20th. Too much corruption, too deep, too widespread and not being mitigated because everyone is in on it.

I am really curious how Trump is thinking to move forward to the 20th, because frankly, I don’t see a path forward. Not legally, and not military.

2
AmericaFirstMAGA88 2 points ago +2 / -0

The deep state just ran too deep.

We knew this was going to happen too, and no one could stop it. That's what pisses me off the most

1
gimmeabreak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Call the legislatures in those fraudulent states and tell them to decertify the electors sent by their governors and to certify the electors sent by the legislatures. That almost ensures that congress has no choice in the manner. The legislatures have plenary powers when it comes to choosing the electors for their states so the safe harbor deadline doesn't apply if they decide to decertify one slate and certify another. Then Congress has no reason to object and Pence has nothing to do but to count the certified electors which will include the alternates that were sent by the legislatures where the fraud occurred instead of the electors certified by their respective governors. Take it out of the hands of Congress entirely. Call your State legislatures!!!

1
Wreckastow [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Each party has a set of Electors for the state, there was one set for Trump, one set for Biden.

EVEN IF, you could somehow, get the legislature to throw out those electors (seems unlikely as it is party based) then THAT Party, would just replace them with people who would vote the exact same way.

Electors are not something we vote on as citizens, its just more back room political bullshit.

1
RedPillDispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

If EITHER HOUSE OR SENATE says..

That's the whole point of you being there. Congress critters are not little gods, and Congress is not Mt. Olympus.

If they say something to take away your God-given rights, you better have something to say back. If they proceed to turn their words into actions ... I don't need to spell it out... "Ms. Pe-lousy, it's nice that you want to impose this Chinese fraud to rule over us, we have only one question, 'You and whose army?'"

0
OperationCatSpeed 0 points ago +1 / -1

The vote is done on a state level by us congressional reps. We win by that count if it is by party lines. Given that things have been falling on swamp lines though, who knows.

4
farfiman 4 points ago +4 / -0

ONLY if both house and senate reject enough electors to get to that stage.

-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18