753
Comments (116)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
SpiceMustFlow 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think it’s ok to ask serious questions but all these people spouting off about 5G conspiracies make no sense.

I get it. He wanted to damage the building. But there are likely other motivations involved.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
3
SpiceMustFlow 3 points ago +4 / -1

I mean. Conspiracies.win is a site now.

Perhaps we can wait for more actual information to come in. It’s early on.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
SpiceMustFlow 2 points ago +3 / -1

Or you could read the part where I made the common sense argument that a guy attacking up a singular building because he is “afraid of 5G”:

  1. Makes no sense from a network perspective.

  2. Does little to improve the world in the long term future.

  3. Killing himself in the process doesn’t support his overall goal. Especially as he made a point to try and save other civilians.

Really the most important factor in regard to 5G is that you’re taking a constructed narrative and running with it for some reason.

There’s zero evidence in regard to the 5G claim. All that was said is that the FBI was looking into it.

That’s like saying the FBI was “looking into” if Carter Page was colluding with Russia.

Zero evidence and likely wild speculation in order to control the media narrative.