753
Comments (116)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
SpiceMustFlow 2 points ago +3 / -1

Or you could read the part where I made the common sense argument that a guy attacking up a singular building because he is “afraid of 5G”:

  1. Makes no sense from a network perspective.

  2. Does little to improve the world in the long term future.

  3. Killing himself in the process doesn’t support his overall goal. Especially as he made a point to try and save other civilians.

Really the most important factor in regard to 5G is that you’re taking a constructed narrative and running with it for some reason.

There’s zero evidence in regard to the 5G claim. All that was said is that the FBI was looking into it.

That’s like saying the FBI was “looking into” if Carter Page was colluding with Russia.

Zero evidence and likely wild speculation in order to control the media narrative.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
SpiceMustFlow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Respectfully you’re just repeating my exact point.

FBI can’t be trusted so why are we trusting them on 5G nonsense.

Very confused.