I agree. Content quality has dropped like a rock since election night, especially in the month of December. There's no news so we manufacture news out of nothing like the left. Disappointing.
I scroll past past content-free posts, and sometimes reverse the updoot, if it irritates me enough. That's as far as I am willing to go.
I also thank people for including the supporting link in the comments.
Yes, we have trolls, yes, we have Jooos-on-the-brain posters, and racists and misogynists, probable FBI pushing for violence, and aptly-named non-Trump supporters like OP (seriously, "tired of winning 2020"?). We also have newbie Dems who tell us what to think. We deal with them in New.
If you can't stand the chaff, select "Hot" or "Rising" or "Top."
Sadly a lot of these bait-clicky Twitter posts rise to the top of hot/rising.
It’s my opinion that we shouldn’t support people just claiming they have breaking evidence that they will sometime in the future maybe release.
Let’s instead foster people to just come out with the evidence already and then they deserve the followers and internet points as a result. Until then, it’s lame and hurts credibility.
Fuck your rules
There is a lot of twitter-posting not even related to any evidence. Just a cap of literal who and their one line take on something. I don't get it
That's what Twitter typically is. I like it best when it includes the links, but of course a screen shot disables the links.
How about FUCK OFF.
I agree. Content quality has dropped like a rock since election night, especially in the month of December. There's no news so we manufacture news out of nothing like the left. Disappointing.
Content quality dropped over the Christmas holiday, and bounced back last night.
No. This is gatekeeping.
Stop.
This is now free speech dies.
With speech rules.
I’d argue it’s how you loose credibility and foster bad habits.
> new rule
Found Bill Maher's account
First time?
I scroll past past content-free posts, and sometimes reverse the updoot, if it irritates me enough. That's as far as I am willing to go.
I also thank people for including the supporting link in the comments.
Yes, we have trolls, yes, we have Jooos-on-the-brain posters, and racists and misogynists, probable FBI pushing for violence, and aptly-named non-Trump supporters like OP (seriously, "tired of winning 2020"?). We also have newbie Dems who tell us what to think. We deal with them in New.
If you can't stand the chaff, select "Hot" or "Rising" or "Top."
Sadly a lot of these bait-clicky Twitter posts rise to the top of hot/rising.
It’s my opinion that we shouldn’t support people just claiming they have breaking evidence that they will sometime in the future maybe release.
Let’s instead foster people to just come out with the evidence already and then they deserve the followers and internet points as a result. Until then, it’s lame and hurts credibility.
Does this new rule take effect in two weeks?
I don’t like loosing credibility because we keep posting the same click bait bull shit.
Last I checked you chose to comment on my post. Not the other way around.
Do you see this s next to my name??? What do you think that means looser?