https://www.bitchute.com/video/0OnAWJSEZGWa/
Completed Paper of the Michigan Analysis: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxxiGqcozWIE6w877yTByQPKO3QDU07HcxBc-Eglzso/edit?usp=sharing
Starting Files and Spreadsheets (link is safe, ignore warning) https://gofile.io/d/SoyqIA
Link to the Polynomial Rotator: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/fx7puzgxdg
Link to Oakland's Residual Plot Generator: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/5fsxk8v52o
Oakland County: Trump suffers a net loss of 112,044 votes. Kent County: Trump suffers a net loss of 44,053 vote (in agreement with Dr. Shiva).
Kalamazoo County: Trump suffers a net loss of 15,910 votes. Ingham County: Unknown, since no prior timestamp contains a higher percentage for Trump than the first timestamp. Access to the tabulation tapes will be required:
Saginaw County: 10,286 votes minimum. Several precincts in Saginaw have no timestamp prior to their first timestamp with a higher percentage for Trump. Access to the tabulation tapes will be required.
Macomb County: Trump suffers a net loss of 70,944 votes.
The City of Detroit: Trump suffers a minimal loss of 225 votes; however, the distribution of Detroit’s ratios show that a different algorithm was used, using Random Number Generation to generate Trump’s initial starting state.
All remaining counties in the analysis: Trump suffers a net loss of 34,518 votes.
How are you deducing the number of votes Trump lost via the Polynomic Sledgehammer? My understanding of your whole theory is that precincts reported real data most of the time (just deltas in each update, e.g. +50Trump +40Biden), except when they were “taken over” by the algorithm and at that point they were reporting fabricated numbers (again, just deltas) that stick out like a sore thumb under analysis. When the precincts were “released”, they went back to reporting true vote increments. So are you simply adding up the difference between the fraud updates what you otherwise assume would have been updated then based on the before/after ratios?
And to be clear, when you say “votes Trump lost”, you mean votes that were stuffed for Biden right? Ultimately on a recount, I assume just about all of the actually-cast Trump physical ballots will be present, unless ballots are being destroyed. Producing fake digital increments during election updates only works if by the end you have stuffed enough fake ballots to back up the Biden total that was intentionally generated by the algorithm, and they need to be stuffed in the correct county.
The same way Dr Shiva did.
What is Trump's starting percentage (per precinct).
What is his ending percentage (in each precinct)
What is the difference between start % times end total VS end% times end total.
Thanks. I ended up finding it on page 58+ on each county’s “Difference Between the Active First and Drop Stases” at the bottom of the page.
Yes, that's the section.
Takes a while to get there scientifically.