My favorite is the consensus argument. Consensus has little to do with science. Consensus is not proof. It only takes one to debunk a hypothesis/theory/law (or downgrade the concept). Yet, they act as though if you get more than one "scientist" to agree on something then it means more than just one scientist with proof of the opposite.
My favorite is the consensus argument. Consensus has little to do with science. Consensus is not proof. It only takes one to debunk a hypothesis/theory/law (or downgrade the concept). Yet, they act as though if you get more than one "scientist" to agree on something then it means more than just one scientist with proof of the opposite.