39 TL;DR: Re-file the Texas suit, but with the United States as plaintif, not Texas. The US has standing, as it was injured when the states did not follow the electors clause. posted 55 days ago by Saul +39 / -0 https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/26/legal-memo-outlines-strategy-for-trump-to-succeed-having-supreme-court-hear-election-dispute-n1286650 https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/26/legal-memo-outlines-strategy-for-trump-to-succeed-having-supreme-court-hear-election-dispute-n1286650 4 comments share 4 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (4) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 4 ▼ – Mtnlion667 4 points 55 days ago +4 / -0 Texas had standing as well. Any state that illegally alters the election affects all other states. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – mandarb916 4 points 55 days ago +4 / -0 Before Jan 20: No standing since Biden hasn't been inaugurated. After Jan 20: You filed too late permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – looncraz 1 point 55 days ago +1 / -0 The suit would need to be brought by the U.S. AG. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Saul [S] 1 point 53 days ago +1 / -0 That's exactly what I'm advocating when I say "with the US as plaintif" permalink parent save report block reply
Texas had standing as well. Any state that illegally alters the election affects all other states.
Before Jan 20: No standing since Biden hasn't been inaugurated.
After Jan 20: You filed too late
The suit would need to be brought by the U.S. AG.
That's exactly what I'm advocating when I say "with the US as plaintif"