Sounds like you didn't see anything demanding to repeal the $600 for illegals, and a retroactive $1200.
This bill stinks to high heaven. The deadlines for the recissions can go past the inauguration date, the dems can run the clock out on all of it - and then the whole bill passes. They have 45 days to respond to the recission request, and they can ignore it until the start of the next session in January.
Not even the Dems, the GOP are in on the bill as well. I did not say Congress wouldn't fuck us, they push these bills out on a yearly basis, the pork obviously for globalist slush finds that circle back as kickbacks. Veto would have been overridden anyway just being honest.
Congress is not in the business to help the American people.
All the statement lays out is that bill was signed and he has made suggestions for future bills. Congress can ignore all of those suggestions. Why be happy about any of that?
Reading that (thanks for the link) I think congress will wait out the 45 days, and then the monies will be allocated. This is a delaying tactic, which has the potential for some positive revisions, but not likely, based on the current congressional desires.
Who said? CNN?
https://archive.is/a3pSG
Sounds like you didn't read the full white house statement on it, stop Dooming.
Sounds like you didn't see anything demanding to repeal the $600 for illegals, and a retroactive $1200.
This bill stinks to high heaven. The deadlines for the recissions can go past the inauguration date, the dems can run the clock out on all of it - and then the whole bill passes. They have 45 days to respond to the recission request, and they can ignore it until the start of the next session in January.
Not even the Dems, the GOP are in on the bill as well. I did not say Congress wouldn't fuck us, they push these bills out on a yearly basis, the pork obviously for globalist slush finds that circle back as kickbacks. Veto would have been overridden anyway just being honest.
Congress is not in the business to help the American people.
All the statement lays out is that bill was signed and he has made suggestions for future bills. Congress can ignore all of those suggestions. Why be happy about any of that?
No, pede, he's sending back a recission request for this specific bill.
Here's how it works:
http://www.crfb.org/blogs/rescissions-how-do-they-work
Note that this act was enacted to limit Nixon's authority over spending. It's not a "get out a shitty spending bill free" for Trump.
Reading that (thanks for the link) I think congress will wait out the 45 days, and then the monies will be allocated. This is a delaying tactic, which has the potential for some positive revisions, but not likely, based on the current congressional desires.
Oh look, a congress swamp believer. I did not know those existed here!
https://archive.is/a3pSG
He signed the bill. It doesn't matter if you get the other $1400 for people, the point is he signed with all the pork.
No insurrection act was not in either recent bill. That was in a june or july bill that never passed as far as I know.
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1343367733753368578?s=19