No, I told you to ignore the videos and focus on the stills.
There's too many garbage "videos" doing the rounds. The stills are far easier to assess for image manipulation via data compression anomaly.
Besides, security cam video is only good for so much. Auto light level adjustment stuffs everthing up. No hope of getting chemical signature from fireball.
The video gives you twin blasts, both chemical. The stills give you the power of the underground blast and the peculiarities of the later RV blast. The second looks like TATP, but who could pre-mix that much and hold it stable? Refrigerated to prevent exothermic reaction from impurities/contaminants? Mxing just prior to initiation?
Or one of the others that would match TATPs weird characteristics?
It's not looking like one of the FBLies wind up mice to me. (Despite their prior form).
I'm sure it wasn't a "5G conspiracy theorist", but I'm getting the suspicion it wasn't an FBLies wind up mouse. The FBLies are fools, but they cannot be complete idiots. I can see how the underground blast was accomplished from across the street, but there is no way the FBLies would have helped one of their pet mice do that.
No offense bro, but I don't care how many stills you look at. You can't tell me what caused those explosions or exactly how it happened just by looking at them.
I appreciate you have knowledge on the subject but I'm gonna have to ask you to back off with your "No just look at it, I told you this is how it is and there is no other way, trust me this is the internet and I'm an expert" comments.
You know, I'm not offended. You and I are just typing on the interwebs.
I appreciate your scepticism. I applaud it. I love that in the face of this torrent of internet information, we have all learned to think and analyze for ourselves, not just trust names or sources.
I may claim to have army training in explosives, demolitions and IEDs. But unless you had similar experience, how could you judge or test my claims?
You could show what I wrote to someone with such qualification or training you know and trust. But you may not have anyone to ask, and may have no relevant knowledge yourself.
I could puff feathers and spout more specialist stuff, but I don't actually think you trusting me or any other random voice on the interwebs is as important as you trusting yourself. I'm not going to qualify my prior comments, because some random discussion about explosives is not as important as supporting your valid scepticism. A scepticism I hope you maintain regarding other topics and commentators.
Sounds interesting..but all we have are grainy videos.
No, I told you to ignore the videos and focus on the stills.
There's too many garbage "videos" doing the rounds. The stills are far easier to assess for image manipulation via data compression anomaly.
Besides, security cam video is only good for so much. Auto light level adjustment stuffs everthing up. No hope of getting chemical signature from fireball.
The video gives you twin blasts, both chemical. The stills give you the power of the underground blast and the peculiarities of the later RV blast. The second looks like TATP, but who could pre-mix that much and hold it stable? Refrigerated to prevent exothermic reaction from impurities/contaminants? Mxing just prior to initiation?
Or one of the others that would match TATPs weird characteristics?
It's not looking like one of the FBLies wind up mice to me. (Despite their prior form).
I'm sure it wasn't a "5G conspiracy theorist", but I'm getting the suspicion it wasn't an FBLies wind up mouse. The FBLies are fools, but they cannot be complete idiots. I can see how the underground blast was accomplished from across the street, but there is no way the FBLies would have helped one of their pet mice do that.
No offense bro, but I don't care how many stills you look at. You can't tell me what caused those explosions or exactly how it happened just by looking at them.
I appreciate you have knowledge on the subject but I'm gonna have to ask you to back off with your "No just look at it, I told you this is how it is and there is no other way, trust me this is the internet and I'm an expert" comments.
You know, I'm not offended. You and I are just typing on the interwebs.
I appreciate your scepticism. I applaud it. I love that in the face of this torrent of internet information, we have all learned to think and analyze for ourselves, not just trust names or sources.
I may claim to have army training in explosives, demolitions and IEDs. But unless you had similar experience, how could you judge or test my claims?
You could show what I wrote to someone with such qualification or training you know and trust. But you may not have anyone to ask, and may have no relevant knowledge yourself.
I could puff feathers and spout more specialist stuff, but I don't actually think you trusting me or any other random voice on the interwebs is as important as you trusting yourself. I'm not going to qualify my prior comments, because some random discussion about explosives is not as important as supporting your valid scepticism. A scepticism I hope you maintain regarding other topics and commentators.