No offense bro, but I don't care how many stills you look at. You can't tell me what caused those explosions or exactly how it happened just by looking at them.
I appreciate you have knowledge on the subject but I'm gonna have to ask you to back off with your "No just look at it, I told you this is how it is and there is no other way, trust me this is the internet and I'm an expert" comments.
You know, I'm not offended. You and I are just typing on the interwebs.
I appreciate your scepticism. I applaud it. I love that in the face of this torrent of internet information, we have all learned to think and analyze for ourselves, not just trust names or sources.
I may claim to have army training in explosives, demolitions and IEDs. But unless you had similar experience, how could you judge or test my claims?
You could show what I wrote to someone with such qualification or training you know and trust. But you may not have anyone to ask, and may have no relevant knowledge yourself.
I could puff feathers and spout more specialist stuff, but I don't actually think you trusting me or any other random voice on the interwebs is as important as you trusting yourself. I'm not going to qualify my prior comments, because some random discussion about explosives is not as important as supporting your valid scepticism. A scepticism I hope you maintain regarding other topics and commentators.
No offense bro, but I don't care how many stills you look at. You can't tell me what caused those explosions or exactly how it happened just by looking at them.
I appreciate you have knowledge on the subject but I'm gonna have to ask you to back off with your "No just look at it, I told you this is how it is and there is no other way, trust me this is the internet and I'm an expert" comments.
You know, I'm not offended. You and I are just typing on the interwebs.
I appreciate your scepticism. I applaud it. I love that in the face of this torrent of internet information, we have all learned to think and analyze for ourselves, not just trust names or sources.
I may claim to have army training in explosives, demolitions and IEDs. But unless you had similar experience, how could you judge or test my claims?
You could show what I wrote to someone with such qualification or training you know and trust. But you may not have anyone to ask, and may have no relevant knowledge yourself.
I could puff feathers and spout more specialist stuff, but I don't actually think you trusting me or any other random voice on the interwebs is as important as you trusting yourself. I'm not going to qualify my prior comments, because some random discussion about explosives is not as important as supporting your valid scepticism. A scepticism I hope you maintain regarding other topics and commentators.