Yup. Temperature to soften is lower than actual melting temperature. Your steel beam doesn't need to be a liquid to cause your building to go down, just a little softening will do fine.
This follows the common hoax-claimer pattern of "sounds good initially, falls apart upon further examination". Just like "why are there no stars in the Apollo moon photos?" and "why are the shadows on the moon at different angles in the same photo if there's only one sun?" and "why are the plus signs in the photos not visible over the spacesuits?" and on and on.
Sounds convincing to a layman, but then a scientist comes along and totally wrecks it with the simple explanation. Heh.
(Respectively - film exposure range too small to clearly photograph both bright moon surface/astronauts as well as dim-ass stars simultaneously, different terrain slopes cause very different shadow angles even with just one point light source, and lastly "bloom" of the bright white spacesuits leaking into and obliterating the very thin plus sign lines on the film. All of these photographic and optical effects can be, and have been, conclusively verified and demonstrated here on Earth)
And jet fuel can't melt it either
Really don’t want to get into this rabbit hole, but you don’t need to melt something to cause enough weakening that failure results.
Yup. Temperature to soften is lower than actual melting temperature. Your steel beam doesn't need to be a liquid to cause your building to go down, just a little softening will do fine.
This follows the common hoax-claimer pattern of "sounds good initially, falls apart upon further examination". Just like "why are there no stars in the Apollo moon photos?" and "why are the shadows on the moon at different angles in the same photo if there's only one sun?" and "why are the plus signs in the photos not visible over the spacesuits?" and on and on.
Sounds convincing to a layman, but then a scientist comes along and totally wrecks it with the simple explanation. Heh.
(Respectively - film exposure range too small to clearly photograph both bright moon surface/astronauts as well as dim-ass stars simultaneously, different terrain slopes cause very different shadow angles even with just one point light source, and lastly "bloom" of the bright white spacesuits leaking into and obliterating the very thin plus sign lines on the film. All of these photographic and optical effects can be, and have been, conclusively verified and demonstrated here on Earth)
MuH sCieNce