4722
Comments (187)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
Paul_Revere 9 points ago +10 / -1

Go and do fucking what?

Should we be armed and/or expecting to start shit? If so, what’re the rules of engagement? What’s the chain of command look like? How do you distinguish friend from foe? How do you avoid friendly fire? What the fuck are the lines of fire? What’s the objective? How do we know when we accomplished it? Then fucking what? Stay in garrison? Go home after a brief scuffle? Hold a Constitutional Convention?

You’ve got people thinking they’re tooling up for 1861 all over again with no fucking clue about any of the above.

I'm glad someone else is asking these questions, because I've been asking them from the beginning. And no one ever has any better answer than "Just be there. And stop asking these things, because if you do, you're a shill, a cuck and a doomer."

10
Redpillgirlfrommars 10 points ago +11 / -1

I’ve talked about this before, saying it’d be a pretty terrible idea to start any kind of civil war on the 6th (and that’s not what Trump implied when he said “will be wild”) because it’d be utter chaos given how unorganized it’d be/no war was ever won sending your own people, unsuspecting (to the point where most won’t even be armed because they believe it’s a protest, not a war) and without a plan to a battle where said battle is then sprung on most of them. Since every supporter was invited to the protest by Trump himself, do we start fighting with elderly/children/women/handicapped people in the crowds or is someone going to chaperone them to a safe area? The logistics do not make sense. I was called a shill/told my opinion doesn’t matter because I’m a woman, lol.

I get we’re fired up and want to burn the whole system down but that doesn’t mean we’re immune from making terrible decisions so long as it’s backed by our outrage.

I still think it’s important to show up in numbers and put the pressure on these people, though, but it’s a relief to see other people here with similar concerns.

4
PadaV4 4 points ago +4 / -0

elderly/children/handicapped shouldnt be there in the first place.

5
itswood 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think some smaller groups have already figured out what needs to be done and God willing they force everyone else's hand. Cause the absolute worst thing that can happen is NOTHING. If jan 6th is all bear mace and trash can shields then I think its a monumental failure.

2
Redpillgirlfrommars 2 points ago +3 / -1

Everyone who wants to be there should be there. Trump invited everyone, not just people you approve of. We should be advocating for all people to come out and exercise their right to protest corruption/support Trump. Gatekeeping who should/should not come is incredibly off-putting and it’s honestly kind of gross coming from our side. You have no more of a right to be there than anyone else and you are in NO position to be deciding who is and is not welcome.

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
7
Levelup 7 points ago +10 / -3

Dude chill. Trump can't say exactly everything on Twitter. It's fucking obvious though that a big part of the plan is going to DC on the 6th and that shit will go down. "Be in DC on the 6th, things will be wild".

RINOs in congress, the senate, the supreme court and fucking everywhere is letting Trump down. Regardless of what happens now I don't want to live with the burden of thinking I let him down as well.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
-1
Spirit_of_Resistance -1 points ago +1 / -2

What I always find amazing about these people who derisively use 'trust the plan' is that they're always in the exact same place and situation as the people they complain aren't doing enough.

As long as there is a single Q person left on this planet, every single anti-Qoomer will spend their entire day doing nothing but telling that person everything is his fault for doing nothing

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
0
Levelup 0 points ago +5 / -5

I trust Donald. If you don't, then what are you doing here?

1
Rufus_Shinra 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is not feasible to form a citizen army for the purpose of civil war without a single state supporting them.

Large groups of people aren't going to change this treasonous corruption, in my opinion any civil disobedience would look more like a covert insurgency with cells of patriots operating independently across the nation. Look, we know who the traitors are and not all are in DC. We have corrupt swing state mayors, DAs and govoners who need to be held accountable. A few dozen patriots could do this better than any planned event.