264
Comments (21)
sorted by:
11
imausertoo 11 points ago +12 / -1

The whole thing stinks to high heaven. The official sounding broadcast, high grade explosives, timing in Christmas morning when no one was around ....

5G excuse is just that....a quick and easy cover-up. No idea what the intent was but I don't think it was successful.

Wonder if there were a bunch of these trucks to be lined up this week all over the country but a local cop fudged the plans and decided to blow up early. On it's own the damage is more of a nuisance.

If you had enough of these all over the country, the damage to our internet infrastructure would be catastrophic.

-1
BestOfTheMidwest -1 points ago +2 / -3

You don't believe the official story of an anti 5g nut, yet you are willing to believe that there was a massive conspiracy to blow these things up around the country with local law enforcement in on it an everything? You might be a retard.

3
ProphetBoi [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Part of the reason we don't believe the official story is who told us the official story. If the media and the FBI want us to believe it's true, they should have never lied to us in the first place.

Also his response is just speculation and not a statement of what he believes.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
JimmyJam 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you listen to the lunacy of the people protesting 5G on my local community facebook page this level of logic would not surprise me

4
sneaky428 4 points ago +7 / -3

He was so afraid of 5G that he called in a missile strike?

15
ProphetBoi [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

He had a kill streak to use

2
Jackdagger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Last 10 seconds of the game you gotta drop the killstreak for a little extra xp. 10 points for slytherin.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Pedeypie 3 points ago +4 / -1

Hahahah

4
Lord_Moo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh no... this is going to start the whole "5G is dangerous" crap again. Spoiler alert - it's not... Despite whether it is or isn't blowing yourself up over 5G being dangerous or not is counter-productive, no?

3
TAIWANNUMBERONE 3 points ago +3 / -0

"By the way this guy is a lone actor but we need to be afraid of all RVs"

Pffffft

1
SALTFREEPOETRY 1 point ago +2 / -1

my neighborhood has installed 4 ATT 5G "light poles" over the last few months..... this is just 1 neighborhood. these things are going up everywhere!

4
imausertoo 4 points ago +6 / -2

Yeah because it's using a higher frequency than conventional towers with much less reach. You need to install more of them at least for the milliwave towers

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
3
MightyThor512 3 points ago +4 / -1

that is correct. 5g is roughly an order of magnitude shorter distance than 4g.

1
CmonPeopleGetReal 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes because higher frequency rf has shorter usable distance. 5g has a considerably higher freq than 4g. Lower frequency can penetrate walls and other much easier, meaning less towers, but tgat makes more congestion and slower speed

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
CmonPeopleGetReal 2 points ago +2 / -0

It actually is more progress, one of the main bottlenecks with 4g and smartphones became the backhaul from the RF onto the copper or fiber grid.

If you have 1 cell tower that covers thousands of people, you are dealing with a lot of radio interference with everyone's phone's trying to get a turn to talk to the tower, then the data gets bottlenecked at the backhaul point as well, especially if it is still on copper.

The difference between 4g large tower sites, and 5g microcells is the difference between trying to hold a conversation in the crowd of a concert, vs holding one in a restaurant. In the restaurant everyone is talking much quieter as there is less interference of noise, in a concert everyone has to yell. This is what is referred to as the "noise floor" as more and more people join the site the noise floor get's raised.

By using more towers, with much lower power per tower, instead of having thousands of phones trying to communicate with a tower you only have a few dozen per tower. This also means you don't need dedicated fiber to each tower, Gig-E copper will work.

Casinos here in Vegas have done this for years now on 4 g with a DAS (distributed antenna system) and micro cell sites. Instead of having to have a single high wattage site you can have hundreds of very low power antennas that are the size of a pack of cigarettes.

You can downvote all you want, i'm just explaining the facts. My closest friend, long time conservative, and MAGA, spent over 20 years working for Cingular which turned into AT&T cellular, as an RF engineer. Half of his career was hunting down RF interference that would jam up cell sites.

1
jetjetjet 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, that's how math works.

-1
Pedeypie -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lol