To me, looks like the RV exploded and moved away from AT&T into the crusty/dirty-roofed building across the street. Must have destroyed at least 2/3 the face of that building (which may have still housed a costume jewelry store and tattoo parlor) right then. In the video of the woman recording with her phone as she's walking to the site from the open parking lot, she gasps as the remaining 1/3-or-so of that building's front suddenly comes down. Also I think the missile video (with the light posts) was a projectile launched from the explosion instead. Couldn't see a missile trail in survelliance video because the explosion flash hid things for that moment. Looks like a lot of tire pieces where flung out, too. (Sources: surveillance cam video, woman/open parking-lot-intersection video, cop/batman-building-intersection video, missile-between-light-posts video, and map app on phone.)
The thing is, it's healthy to question everything. Even if it means entertaining the notion the RV didn't explode. If it doesn't hold up to scrutiny, then fine, eliminate that as possible explanation. The thing is, 2016 opened my eyes you can't believe anything or anyone at face value anymore.
It was parked as close to the building as possible without being on the sidewalk. I haven’t seen any camera footage that makes it super clear but RV looks like it was parked by the front doors of the building.
Some of the videos look like there was a blast on the opposite side but if you watch frame by frame you can see that is after the initial fireball. I’m guessing the blast caused a sympathetic detonation of another vehicle and the gas tank is making that second blast.
Looks like a fuckton of debris being thrown towards the camera on the left side of the street that is obscuring the fireball on the left side. Less smoke and debris on right makes it look like the fireball isnt engulfing the entire width of the street.
Was the AT&T building so strong (Cold War era/built for nuclear blast survival?) that the RV explosion pushed away from it and into the building across the street?
To me, looks like the RV exploded and moved away from AT&T into the crusty/dirty-roofed building across the street. Must have destroyed at least 2/3 the face of that building (which may have still housed a costume jewelry store and tattoo parlor) right then. In the video of the woman recording with her phone as she's walking to the site from the open parking lot, she gasps as the remaining 1/3-or-so of that building's front suddenly comes down. Also I think the missile video (with the light posts) was a projectile launched from the explosion instead. Couldn't see a missile trail in survelliance video because the explosion flash hid things for that moment. Looks like a lot of tire pieces where flung out, too. (Sources: surveillance cam video, woman/open parking-lot-intersection video, cop/batman-building-intersection video, missile-between-light-posts video, and map app on phone.)
The thing is, it's healthy to question everything. Even if it means entertaining the notion the RV didn't explode. If it doesn't hold up to scrutiny, then fine, eliminate that as possible explanation. The thing is, 2016 opened my eyes you can't believe anything or anyone at face value anymore.
Ans thanks for the concise rebuttal to this post.
This does a great job of confirming that it was the RV that exploded.
Yeah, this makes it pretty clear that the explosion did come from the rv.
It's probably the gas tank or something flying across the street and still burning
rv explodes to blind the cameras from the real explosion in the building
There was a bomb in the RV. It just wasn't the device that caused the underground damage to the AT&T facility.
It's no good watching videos. Most are of dubious providence and have been altered. The evidence is in the post event stills.
Why wasn't the RV positioned closer to the AT&T facility? This is the question.
It was parked as close to the building as possible without being on the sidewalk. I haven’t seen any camera footage that makes it super clear but RV looks like it was parked by the front doors of the building.
Pre-Blast Post-Blast
Some of the videos look like there was a blast on the opposite side but if you watch frame by frame you can see that is after the initial fireball. I’m guessing the blast caused a sympathetic detonation of another vehicle and the gas tank is making that second blast.
Looks like a fuckton of debris being thrown towards the camera on the left side of the street that is obscuring the fireball on the left side. Less smoke and debris on right makes it look like the fireball isnt engulfing the entire width of the street.
The timing and target are not coincidence. The fact that there was an explosion is enough to know something isn't right here.
Was the AT&T building so strong (Cold War era/built for nuclear blast survival?) that the RV explosion pushed away from it and into the building across the street?