I'm on the fence with Lin. He really does seem to be either LARPing, or gullible, or purposefully putting out disinfo. His twitter is kind of a trash fire.
I'm at a point with Lin Wood where I'd rather see him focus his energy on defending kyle somehow.
Powell I think is still good, but proving digital espionage is not something done easily. There is no "hard evidence" when it comes to computers. The general public barely understands what an IP address is, and it's the public opinion that needs to be won right now.
It kills me that the MSM in some capacity has some of you calling a known Q Anon follower a “larper”. Despite the massive overwhelming glowing neon sign from big tech when they COMPLETELY purged all Q material from the internet. That action alone without anything else should have told you all everything you needed to know.
Here's the key though, those machines are supposed to hold on to all of the computer logs. The few that have been investigated (particularly thinking of the one involving that marijuana ballot) THE LOGS WERE DELETED.
That alone should be evidence and proof enough of wrong doing but our ancient dinosaurs in the judicial wing are too busy doing chinese cocaine.
I'm on the fence with Lin. He really does seem to be either LARPing, or gullible, or purposefully putting out disinfo. His twitter is kind of a trash fire.
I'm at a point with Lin Wood where I'd rather see him focus his energy on defending kyle somehow.
Powell I think is still good, but proving digital espionage is not something done easily. There is no "hard evidence" when it comes to computers. The general public barely understands what an IP address is, and it's the public opinion that needs to be won right now.
It kills me that the MSM in some capacity has some of you calling a known Q Anon follower a “larper”. Despite the massive overwhelming glowing neon sign from big tech when they COMPLETELY purged all Q material from the internet. That action alone without anything else should have told you all everything you needed to know.
They were censoring an idea. Q is not a real person, but it's "real enough" to rally people.
Q is a LARP. I took can sit here and make hundreds and hundreds of predictions anonymously, then be right once in a while.
Has Q correctly predicted anything that hadn't happened already?
Good point.
Here's the key though, those machines are supposed to hold on to all of the computer logs. The few that have been investigated (particularly thinking of the one involving that marijuana ballot) THE LOGS WERE DELETED.
That alone should be evidence and proof enough of wrong doing but our ancient dinosaurs in the judicial wing are too busy doing chinese cocaine.