Moderns and Pfizer are mRNA, the others have the MEK cell line and whatever the other one is. Both are evil though, dancing with genetic modification is one of those "man's health above all else" moves.
Yep. And don't forget DES. And when they used to x-ray pregnant women's bellies with old school, high dose ratiation to make sure baby would fit through the birth canal. Oops! Nothing to see here...moving along.
Not to my knowledge & I've been following this pretty closely... HOWEVER it does still say that those who are pregnant are advised not to get it, but given that a bunch of pregnant women have been posting that they've gotten the vaccine/posting Instagram videos of themselves getting it, it would seem those warnings have fallen on deaf ears.
What's the reproductive problem? It never said anything about a reproductive problem, that is an assumption made. If you have receipts, I'm all ears but if your LARPing there is a Q sub for you.
Yes I know how to read which is why I responded to you with a factual response rather than just cry "wahhh shill". Look at my history if you think I'm a shill, I've been around so much longer than you. Now you are certainly free to rebuke what I said if your ready to stop acting like an emotional liberal who cries when they are wrong.
Ive been here longer than you buddy - it is right in the image no unprotected sex for 28 after the second vaccine due to reproductive risk. Hopefully they fixed that issue somehow, i wouldnt know im not a scientist, im just going by what i read right in the headline.
Also the part that says 'reproductive risk' was added in photoshop, nowhere in the actual reciepts is the words 'reproductive risk' mentioned. A simple CNTRL + F could have saved you an L.
Im guessing you did not read the pfizer study? It is right in there, it says men and women of child bearing potential must refrain from sex to eliminate reproductive safety risks. Read you muppet.
So you keep saying reproductive risk, but you can never go into more detail than that, why? It's because you are low information and speaking about things that you don't understand.
Oh you illiterate fool, you clearly haven’t read what you linked. It’s a clinical trial where they are looking for any harm, not warning of it.
Here is the sauce:
Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s):
• Refrain from donating sperm.
PLUS either:
• Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent.
OR
• Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person.
• In addition to male condom use, a highly effective method of contraception may be considered in WOCBP partners of male participants (refer to the list of highly effective methods below in Section 10.4.4).
10.4.2. Female Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least 1 of the following conditions applies:
• Is not a WOCBP (see definitions below in Section 10.4.3). OR
• Is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention.
The investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with an early undetected pregnancy.
And it's odd that the only other vaccine that "sexual activity" is mentioned during the trial... was for HPV. (Which makes sense for what it's being used for.)
Reading other vaccine trials, I cannot find language specifically restricting sexual activity.
Yes. They are saying that men taking part in the study can't have sex with women of child bearing potential unless they take great pains to prevent pregnancy. What possible risk could there be for a woman not in the study having a child from a man that is in the study.... Oh right! It fucks with the guy's sperm. Think you absolute muupet.
You are free to believe whatever you want, but there is no basis in reality. Find some evidence to support your view, oh wait there is ~zero~. I'm a receipts or GTFO person, the only people who get pissed when asked for receipts are liars and bullshitters.
Or.. hear me out...
Maybe, just maybe... follow me here....
There is going to be a report in 5 or 10 years stating a percent rate of sterilization caused by the covid vaccines, so no goblins..
Just sterilized.
So.. no kids.
"Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention,which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk"
This was from the trial it is not required for taking the vaccine. It dies mean the vaccine is not tested on pregnant women. We followed the link and read the guide, upfront it states clinical trials Phase 1 and 2, both of which are concluded now.
FAKE NEWS!!!
You didn't read the paper. It talks about men in the study not having sex with women not in the study unless they are on rock solid birth control. Why would that be needed? Oh, because it fucks with the guy's sperm.
It's still White Genocide. They are obviously willing to sacrifice all joggers currently in white people's lands, knowing that because they have a r reproductive strategy Africa can pump billions of them non stop.
On the Exclusion Criteria in Section 5.3, they list that individuals with a history of auto-immune disease were excluded.
They list 'Phase 1 Only', so I don't understand if those individuals were only excluded from phase 1? Or also other phases?
They also list that they excluded people who had a clinical diagnosis for covid as well. Meaning if you have had covid, you are the guinea pig if you take the vx (if I'm reading if correctly).
Not necessarily. If you wanted to test the efficacy of a vax in non-prior infected populations, you would necessarily need non-infected people. People who recovered could be immune because the vaccine or because of their natural antibodies.
The paper protocol stops men in the study from having sex with women not in the study unless they are on rock solid birth control. Why would that be needed? Oh right... Because it fucks with the guy's sperm.
The problem is LARPy posts like this one discredit legitimate claims in the eyes of most people. There are legitimate concerns but this post is so low information it isn't funny. This post has nothing to do with the safety profile, but rather specific criterion needed for clinical trials. A quick google search would go a long way.
The point of posts like this... it's to get you to duckduck on your own.
So people can make their own confirmations and not just believe some rando on the internet.
I agree thinking for yourself is a good thing, but I would prefer if we stick to the truth. We have facts and truth on our side, why fabricate stuff that is easily disproven with one search?
looks like the other 52 genders are good to go! /s
For all we know this vaccine could create the another 52 genders.
we finally get some facts straight!!
This is sad and funny at the same time.
Moderns and Pfizer are mRNA, the others have the MEK cell line and whatever the other one is. Both are evil though, dancing with genetic modification is one of those "man's health above all else" moves.
So then you like the Moderna vaccine? I'm also assuming your very anti-blood infusion as well since you say another's DNA is bad.
https://www.lifenews.com/2020/11/16/new-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine-not-created-with-fetal-cells-from-babies-killed-in-abortions/
Wtf no, bigot.
You see, gender is a social construct, meaning that there is no real defining number of genders. There is, in fact, infinite.
Get edumacated. You’re just brainwashed.
/s if needed
/s
Yep. And don't forget DES. And when they used to x-ray pregnant women's bellies with old school, high dose ratiation to make sure baby would fit through the birth canal. Oops! Nothing to see here...moving along.
Not familiar with that term. Given the name I'm guessing it is a pharmaceutical compound though?
Flipper babies. A drug prescribed for morning sickness and nausea caused massive amounts of birth defects.
Oh that one! I remember reading about those cases caused by a motion-sickness drug but couldn't recall the name. Thanks for the info :)
I think this is for the clinical trials, not the actual vaccine
Not to my knowledge & I've been following this pretty closely... HOWEVER it does still say that those who are pregnant are advised not to get it, but given that a bunch of pregnant women have been posting that they've gotten the vaccine/posting Instagram videos of themselves getting it, it would seem those warnings have fallen on deaf ears.
"Hurry up! Give it to the Black People" - Bill Gates.
https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol.pdf
I think I found the reference the blurry ass image ... Check out page 123, not 132.
Thank you...
So did they fixed the reproductive problem with taking the vaccine?
Sure, why not
What's the reproductive problem? It never said anything about a reproductive problem, that is an assumption made. If you have receipts, I'm all ears but if your LARPing there is a Q sub for you.
Do you know how to read? Or are you just a shill.
Yes I know how to read which is why I responded to you with a factual response rather than just cry "wahhh shill". Look at my history if you think I'm a shill, I've been around so much longer than you. Now you are certainly free to rebuke what I said if your ready to stop acting like an emotional liberal who cries when they are wrong.
Ive been here longer than you buddy - it is right in the image no unprotected sex for 28 after the second vaccine due to reproductive risk. Hopefully they fixed that issue somehow, i wouldnt know im not a scientist, im just going by what i read right in the headline.
Also the part that says 'reproductive risk' was added in photoshop, nowhere in the actual reciepts is the words 'reproductive risk' mentioned. A simple CNTRL + F could have saved you an L.
Im guessing you did not read the pfizer study? It is right in there, it says men and women of child bearing potential must refrain from sex to eliminate reproductive safety risks. Read you muppet.
So you keep saying reproductive risk, but you can never go into more detail than that, why? It's because you are low information and speaking about things that you don't understand.
https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol.pdf
Page 123....
this mugwump is an idiot.
Oh you illiterate fool, you clearly haven’t read what you linked. It’s a clinical trial where they are looking for any harm, not warning of it.
Here is the sauce:
And it's odd that the only other vaccine that "sexual activity" is mentioned during the trial... was for HPV. (Which makes sense for what it's being used for.)
Reading other vaccine trials, I cannot find language specifically restricting sexual activity.
Yes. They are saying that men taking part in the study can't have sex with women of child bearing potential unless they take great pains to prevent pregnancy. What possible risk could there be for a woman not in the study having a child from a man that is in the study.... Oh right! It fucks with the guy's sperm. Think you absolute muupet.
You are free to believe whatever you want, but there is no basis in reality. Find some evidence to support your view, oh wait there is ~zero~. I'm a receipts or GTFO person, the only people who get pissed when asked for receipts are liars and bullshitters.
The receipt is the protocol paper you absolute retard. I guess reading for comprehension is a dying skill these days, eh.
-After 28 days?
-No worries, this is a contraception for life. -What?
What?
Good news, you don't have Covid. Bad news, you just gave birth to a goblin.
Or.. hear me out... Maybe, just maybe... follow me here.... There is going to be a report in 5 or 10 years stating a percent rate of sterilization caused by the covid vaccines, so no goblins.. Just sterilized. So.. no kids.
Bingo.
Does someone have an actual direct link to this warning? (The one on the image goes nowhere)
Yes, direct link would be great, need to forward this to family, thank you
https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol.pdf
page 123
"Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention,which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk"
Thank you, much appreciated!
That sounds a little more ominous than the typical vaccine.
This was from the trial it is not required for taking the vaccine. It dies mean the vaccine is not tested on pregnant women. We followed the link and read the guide, upfront it states clinical trials Phase 1 and 2, both of which are concluded now. FAKE NEWS!!!
Yes, this is to participate in clinical trials only!
You didn't read the paper. It talks about men in the study not having sex with women not in the study unless they are on rock solid birth control. Why would that be needed? Oh, because it fucks with the guy's sperm.
If your vaccine prevents me from smashing my wife's pussy and making more children, then I'll have to pass thanks though!
I too... choose this guys (not dead) wife.
** sorry if you don't understand the reference **
"No Nut Phizer"
I guess all the other methods to achieve the White Genocide were not fast enough.
Actually their focus tends to be on black and brown people with these vaccinations. (See Bill Gates).
It's still White Genocide. They are obviously willing to sacrifice all joggers currently in white people's lands, knowing that because they have a r reproductive strategy Africa can pump billions of them non stop.
Say What???
And they still got men to volunteer for the trials? I'm guessing they didn't tell them.
I would really like to have a doctor that’s not “just doin my job” read through this line by line and explain how this is a good thing.
So it turns you into a commie then after 28 days turns your children into commies. Before that there is no effect.
On the Exclusion Criteria in Section 5.3, they list that individuals with a history of auto-immune disease were excluded.
They list 'Phase 1 Only', so I don't understand if those individuals were only excluded from phase 1? Or also other phases?
They also list that they excluded people who had a clinical diagnosis for covid as well. Meaning if you have had covid, you are the guinea pig if you take the vx (if I'm reading if correctly).
Not necessarily. If you wanted to test the efficacy of a vax in non-prior infected populations, you would necessarily need non-infected people. People who recovered could be immune because the vaccine or because of their natural antibodies.
The paper protocol stops men in the study from having sex with women not in the study unless they are on rock solid birth control. Why would that be needed? Oh right... Because it fucks with the guy's sperm.
The problem is LARPy posts like this one discredit legitimate claims in the eyes of most people. There are legitimate concerns but this post is so low information it isn't funny. This post has nothing to do with the safety profile, but rather specific criterion needed for clinical trials. A quick google search would go a long way.
The point of posts like this... it's to get you to duckduck on your own. So people can make their own confirmations and not just believe some rando on the internet.
I agree thinking for yourself is a good thing, but I would prefer if we stick to the truth. We have facts and truth on our side, why fabricate stuff that is easily disproven with one search?
I wish the small text was legible
what the actual fukkk ?!