The problem is LARPy posts like this one discredit legitimate claims in the eyes of most people. There are legitimate concerns but this post is so low information it isn't funny. This post has nothing to do with the safety profile, but rather specific criterion needed for clinical trials. A quick google search would go a long way.
The point of posts like this... it's to get you to duckduck on your own.
So people can make their own confirmations and not just believe some rando on the internet.
I agree thinking for yourself is a good thing, but I would prefer if we stick to the truth. We have facts and truth on our side, why fabricate stuff that is easily disproven with one search?
The problem is LARPy posts like this one discredit legitimate claims in the eyes of most people. There are legitimate concerns but this post is so low information it isn't funny. This post has nothing to do with the safety profile, but rather specific criterion needed for clinical trials. A quick google search would go a long way.
The point of posts like this... it's to get you to duckduck on your own. So people can make their own confirmations and not just believe some rando on the internet.
I agree thinking for yourself is a good thing, but I would prefer if we stick to the truth. We have facts and truth on our side, why fabricate stuff that is easily disproven with one search?