690
Comments (74)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-3
mugwump -3 points ago +1 / -4

Yes I know how to read which is why I responded to you with a factual response rather than just cry "wahhh shill". Look at my history if you think I'm a shill, I've been around so much longer than you. Now you are certainly free to rebuke what I said if your ready to stop acting like an emotional liberal who cries when they are wrong.

5
I_LUV_WINNING 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ive been here longer than you buddy - it is right in the image no unprotected sex for 28 after the second vaccine due to reproductive risk. Hopefully they fixed that issue somehow, i wouldnt know im not a scientist, im just going by what i read right in the headline.

-3
mugwump -3 points ago +1 / -4

Also the part that says 'reproductive risk' was added in photoshop, nowhere in the actual reciepts is the words 'reproductive risk' mentioned. A simple CNTRL + F could have saved you an L.

5
I_LUV_WINNING 5 points ago +5 / -0

Im guessing you did not read the pfizer study? It is right in there, it says men and women of child bearing potential must refrain from sex to eliminate reproductive safety risks. Read you muppet.

-4
mugwump -4 points ago +0 / -4

So you keep saying reproductive risk, but you can never go into more detail than that, why? It's because you are low information and speaking about things that you don't understand.