690
Comments (74)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-4
mugwump -4 points ago +1 / -5

Oh you illiterate fool, you clearly haven’t read what you linked. It’s a clinical trial where they are looking for any harm, not warning of it.

Here is the sauce:

Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s): • Refrain from donating sperm. PLUS either: • Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent. OR • Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person. • In addition to male condom use, a highly effective method of contraception may be considered in WOCBP partners of male participants (refer to the list of highly effective methods below in Section 10.4.4). 10.4.2. Female Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least 1 of the following conditions applies: • Is not a WOCBP (see definitions below in Section 10.4.3). OR • Is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention. The investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with an early undetected pregnancy.

4
cpyder 4 points ago +4 / -0

And it's odd that the only other vaccine that "sexual activity" is mentioned during the trial... was for HPV. (Which makes sense for what it's being used for.)

Reading other vaccine trials, I cannot find language specifically restricting sexual activity.

1
dixond 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes. They are saying that men taking part in the study can't have sex with women of child bearing potential unless they take great pains to prevent pregnancy. What possible risk could there be for a woman not in the study having a child from a man that is in the study.... Oh right! It fucks with the guy's sperm. Think you absolute muupet.

-2
mugwump -2 points ago +1 / -3

You are free to believe whatever you want, but there is no basis in reality. Find some evidence to support your view, oh wait there is ~zero~. I'm a receipts or GTFO person, the only people who get pissed when asked for receipts are liars and bullshitters.

1
dixond 1 point ago +2 / -1

The receipt is the protocol paper you absolute retard. I guess reading for comprehension is a dying skill these days, eh.

0
mugwump 0 points ago +1 / -1

The paper does not say what you allege. They were assessing whether reproductive harm occurred, not stating that it does you absolute retard. Before calling someone illiterate, try reading yourself. You are both ignorant and arrogant.