The paper does not say what you allege. They were assessing whether reproductive harm occurred, not stating that it does you absolute retard. Before calling someone illiterate, try reading yourself. You are both ignorant and arrogant.
What possible reproductive harm could occur that would specifically involve a woman of child bearing potential that isn't involved in their study? Why would they even worry about that? Is that a normal protocol for new drug tests? (hint, it's not).
The receipt is the protocol paper you absolute retard. I guess reading for comprehension is a dying skill these days, eh.
The paper does not say what you allege. They were assessing whether reproductive harm occurred, not stating that it does you absolute retard. Before calling someone illiterate, try reading yourself. You are both ignorant and arrogant.
What possible reproductive harm could occur that would specifically involve a woman of child bearing potential that isn't involved in their study? Why would they even worry about that? Is that a normal protocol for new drug tests? (hint, it's not).
It’s unknown, hence why it’s being studied.
Weird. Why didn't they study the recipients risk of being struck by lightning? That's unknown, too.